• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国新诊断类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎或强直性脊柱炎患者的疾病修饰抗风湿药物治疗模式。

Treatment Patterns with Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in U.S. Veterans with Newly Diagnosed Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, or Ankylosing Spondylitis.

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs and University of Utah Medical Centers.

Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs and University of Utah Medical Centers.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Nov;25(11):1218-1228. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.11.1218.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.11.1218
PMID:31663467
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10398041/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delays in treatment for inflammatory arthritis (IA) are associated with unfavorable outcomes, including impaired quality of life, irreversible joint damage, and disability.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize treatment initiation patterns in veterans with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

ICD-9/10-CM codes and natural language processing were used to identify incident cases of RA, PsA, or AS between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2015, in patients enrolled in the Veterans Health Administration. Patterns of treatment initiation and nontreatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were assessed in the 12-month follow-up period after the incident diagnosis. Outcomes included the percentage of veterans treated with a DMARD, the mean time to the initial DMARD after diagnosis, and the percentage of veterans who accessed rheumatology care before DMARD initiation. To assess outcomes over time, veterans were grouped by year of initial IA diagnosis. Additionally, outcomes were compared between nonbiologic and biologic DMARDs and among IA subtypes (RA, PsA, and AS). Groups were statistically compared with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

The population consisted of 12,118 IA veterans (9,711 RA, 1,472 PsA, and 935 AS), with 91.3% males and a mean age of 63.7 years. The percentage of veterans treated with ≥ 1 DMARD (nonbiologic or biologic) during the 12-month follow-up period increased from 48.8% in 2007 to 66.4% in 2015. In veterans diagnosed with IA in 2015, DMARD treatment was more common for PsA patients (72.9%) and RA patients (68.6%) than for AS patients (28.9%). In the subset treated with a DMARD within 12 months after diagnosis, the mean time to the initial DMARD after diagnosis did not change throughout the observation period (35.5 days for RA, 43.9 days for PsA, and 59.5 days for AS). Rheumatology specialty care was accessed by 87.4% of veterans treated with a nonbiologic DMARD and 92.2% of veterans treated with a biologic DMARD, in patients diagnosed in 2015.

CONCLUSIONS

DMARD treatment rates during the initial 12 months after diagnosis increased between 2007 and 2015, but nontreatment remained common, particularly in veterans with AS. The time to treatment after diagnosis was stable over time; it was shortest for RA, intermediate for PsA, and longest for AS. DMARD treatment was uncommon in veterans who did not access rheumatology specialty care.

DISCLOSURES

AbbVie Pharmaceuticals and Marriott Daughters Foundation funded this study via investigator-initiated grants. Data analyses were completed by investigators independent of AbbVie and Marriott Daughters Foundation. Walker, Clewell, and Douglas are employed by, and stockholders in, Abbvie. Halwani reports grants from BMS, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Seattle Genetics, Roche-Genentech, Miragen, Immunedesign, Takeda, Amgen, Pharmacyclics, and Abbvie. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

摘要

背景

炎症性关节炎(IA)治疗的延迟与不良结局有关,包括生活质量受损、不可逆转的关节损伤和残疾。

目的

描述新诊断类风湿关节炎(RA)、银屑病关节炎(PsA)或强直性脊柱炎(AS)退伍军人的治疗起始模式。

方法

使用 ICD-9/10-CM 代码和自然语言处理,在退伍军人健康管理局登记的患者中,确定 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间新确诊的 RA、PsA 或 AS 病例。在确诊后 12 个月的随访期间,评估治疗起始和未治疗疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARDs)的模式。结果包括接受 DMARD 治疗的退伍军人的百分比、诊断后初始 DMARD 的平均时间以及在开始 DMARD 前接受风湿病学治疗的退伍军人的百分比。为了评估随时间变化的结果,根据初始 IA 诊断的年份将退伍军人分为不同组。此外,还比较了非生物和生物 DMARD 之间以及 IA 亚型(RA、PsA 和 AS)之间的结果。使用 95%置信区间对组进行了统计学比较。

结果

该人群包括 12118 名 IA 退伍军人(9711 名 RA、1472 名 PsA 和 935 名 AS),其中 91.3%为男性,平均年龄为 63.7 岁。在 12 个月的随访期间,接受≥1 种 DMARD(非生物或生物)治疗的退伍军人百分比从 2007 年的 48.8%增加到 2015 年的 66.4%。在 2015 年确诊为 IA 的退伍军人中,与 AS 患者(28.9%)相比,PsA 患者(72.9%)和 RA 患者(68.6%)接受 DMARD 治疗更为常见。在确诊后 12 个月内接受 DMARD 治疗的亚组中,诊断后初始 DMARD 的平均时间在整个观察期间没有变化(RA 为 35.5 天,PsA 为 43.9 天,AS 为 59.5 天)。在 2015 年确诊的患者中,接受非生物 DMARD 治疗的 87.4%和接受生物 DMARD 治疗的 92.2%的退伍军人接受了风湿病学专科治疗。

结论

2007 年至 2015 年间,诊断后最初 12 个月内 DMARD 治疗率有所增加,但治疗仍不常见,尤其是在 AS 退伍军人中。从诊断到治疗的时间相对稳定;RA 最短,PsA 居中,AS 最长。未接受风湿病学专科治疗的退伍军人 DMARD 治疗率较低。

披露

AbbVie 制药公司和万豪女儿基金会通过资助者发起的赠款资助了这项研究。数据分析由 AbbVie 和万豪女儿基金会独立的研究人员完成。Walker、Clewell 和 Douglas 受雇于 AbbVie,是 AbbVie 的股东。Halwani 报告说,他收到了 BMS、Kyowa Hakko Kirin、Roche-Genentech、Miragen、Immunedesign、Takeda、Amgen、Pharmacyclics 和 Abbvie 的资助。其他作者没有任何利益冲突。

相似文献

1
Treatment Patterns with Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in U.S. Veterans with Newly Diagnosed Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, or Ankylosing Spondylitis.美国新诊断类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎或强直性脊柱炎患者的疾病修饰抗风湿药物治疗模式。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Nov;25(11):1218-1228. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.11.1218.
2
Missed opportunities for treatment of inflammatory arthritis and factors associated with non-treatment: An observational cohort study in United States Veterans with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis.炎症性关节炎治疗机会错失及未治疗相关因素:美国类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎或强直性脊柱炎退伍军人的观察性队列研究。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2024 Jun;66:152436. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152436. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
3
Treatment persistence among patients with rheumatoid disease (RA, AS, PsA) treated with subcutaneous biologics in Germany.德国接受皮下生物制剂治疗的类风湿病(类风湿关节炎、强直性脊柱炎、银屑病关节炎)患者的治疗持续性。
Rheumatol Int. 2016 Jan;36(1):143-53. doi: 10.1007/s00296-015-3348-4. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
4
Use of Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs for Inflammatory Arthritis in US Veterans: Effect of Specialty Care and Geographic Distance.美国退伍军人中用于治疗炎症性关节炎的疾病修饰抗风湿药物的使用:专科护理和地理距离的影响。
J Rheumatol. 2018 Mar;45(3):430-436. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170554. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
5
Impact of a Patient Support Program on Patient Adherence to Adalimumab and Direct Medical Costs in Crohn's Disease, Ulcerative Colitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Ankylosing Spondylitis.患者支持计划对克罗恩病、溃疡性结肠炎、类风湿性关节炎、银屑病、银屑病关节炎和强直性脊柱炎患者阿达木单抗依从性和直接医疗费用的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Aug;23(8):859-867. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.16272. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
6
Delay in initiation of DMARD or anti-inflammatory therapy in patients newly diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis: An analysis of United States Military Health System TRICARE beneficiaries.新诊断为类风湿关节炎患者延迟使用 DMARD 或抗炎治疗:美国军事卫生系统 TRICARE 受益人的分析。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Apr;48(5):821-827. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
7
Factors associated with the initiation of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in Texas Medicaid patients with rheumatoid arthritis.与德克萨斯州医疗补助计划(Medicaid)类风湿关节炎患者开始使用生物类改善病情抗风湿药物相关的因素。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 May;21(5):401-7. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.5.401.
8
Examining Time to Initiation of Biologic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Medication Adherence and Persistence Among Texas Medicaid Recipients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.调查德克萨斯州类风湿性关节炎医疗补助受助者开始使用生物性改善病情抗风湿药物的时间以及药物依从性和持续性。
Clin Ther. 2016 Mar;38(3):646-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.01.022. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
9
Treatment patterns in psoriatic arthritis patients newly initiated on oral nonbiologic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.新开始口服非生物或生物改善病情抗风湿药物的银屑病关节炎患者的治疗模式。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Aug 22;16(4):420. doi: 10.1186/s13075-014-0420-5.
10
Risk of Subsequent Infection Among Patients Receiving Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors and Other Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs.肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂和其他疾病修正抗风湿药物治疗患者的后续感染风险。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Jan;68(1):67-76. doi: 10.1002/art.39416.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends of lymphoma incidence in US veterans with rheumatoid arthritis, 2002-2017.2002-2017 年美国类风湿关节炎退伍军人淋巴瘤发病率趋势。
RMD Open. 2020 Jul;6(2). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001241.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Perspectives on DMARD Safety Concerns in Rheumatology Trials: Results from Inflammatory Arthritis Patient Focus Groups and OMERACT Attendees Discussion.患者对风湿病学试验中 DMARD 安全性问题的看法:来自炎症性关节炎患者焦点小组和 OMERACT 与会者讨论的结果。
J Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;46(9):1168-1172. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.181185. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
2
Methotrexate for psoriatic arthritis.甲氨蝶呤用于治疗银屑病关节炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 18;1(1):CD012722. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012722.pub2.
3
Special Article: 2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis.特稿:2018 年美国风湿病学会/国家银屑病基金会银屑病关节炎治疗指南。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Jan;71(1):2-29. doi: 10.1002/acr.23789. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
4
Trajectory of radiographic change over a decade: the effect of transition from conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs to anti-tumour necrosis factor in patients with psoriatic arthritis.十年来影像学改变的轨迹:从传统合成改善病情抗风湿药物向抗肿瘤坏死因子治疗转变对银屑病关节炎患者的影响。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Feb 1;58(2):269-273. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key297.
5
The British Society for Rheumatology biologic DMARD safety guidelines in inflammatory arthritis.英国风湿病学会关于炎性关节炎生物改善病情抗风湿药的安全指南。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Feb 1;58(2):372. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key298.
6
Novel Concepts in Psoriatic Arthritis Management: Can We Treat to Target?银屑病关节炎治疗新理念:可否靶向治疗?
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2018 Sep 18;20(11):71. doi: 10.1007/s11926-018-0781-x.
7
Delay in initiation of DMARD or anti-inflammatory therapy in patients newly diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis: An analysis of United States Military Health System TRICARE beneficiaries.新诊断为类风湿关节炎患者延迟使用 DMARD 或抗炎治疗:美国军事卫生系统 TRICARE 受益人的分析。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Apr;48(5):821-827. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
8
Healthcare Utilization and Direct Costs in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis Using a Large US Administrative Claims Database.利用美国大型行政索赔数据库分析强直性脊柱炎患者的医疗保健利用情况及直接成本
Rheumatol Ther. 2018 Dec;5(2):463-474. doi: 10.1007/s40744-018-0124-4. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
9
Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug initiation among patients newly diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis.新诊断为类风湿关节炎患者的疾病修饰抗风湿药物的起始治疗。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Jul;24(8 Spec No.):SP279-SP285.
10
Treatment Patterns of Newly Diagnosed Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients from a Commercially Insured Population.来自商业保险人群的新诊断类风湿关节炎患者的治疗模式
Rheumatol Ther. 2018 Dec;5(2):355-369. doi: 10.1007/s40744-018-0114-6. Epub 2018 May 30.