Suppr超能文献

棕榈酸帕利哌酮对精神分裂症患者住院率的影响:一项回顾性镜像研究。

The Impact of Paliperidone Palmitate on Hospitalization in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Retrospective Mirror-image Study.

作者信息

Oh So-Young, Jon Duk-In, Hong Hyun Ju, Hong Narei, Yi Jung-Seo, Roh Daeyoung, Jung Myung Hun

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea.

Department of Psychiatry, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2019 Nov 20;17(4):531-536. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2019.17.4.531.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Whether long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAI) are superior to oral antipsychotics remains a controversial question, and results vary depending on the study design. Our study was performed to compare outcomes of oral antipsychotics and paliperidone palmitate (PP) in clinical practice by investigating the numbers of admissions and bed days.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational mirror-image study at a single medical center, reviewing medical charts to obtain the clinical data. Forty-six patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who had received at least two doses of PP were included in the analysis. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the numbers of bed days and admissions 1 year before starting PP with those numbers at 1 year after.

RESULTS

The mean number of admissions fell from 0.83 to 0.17 per patient ( < 0.0002), and the median fell from 1 to 0. The mean number of bed days decreased significantly, from 24.85 to 8.74 days ( < 0.006). The outcomes remained similar in sensitivity analyses set up with different mirror points.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that initiating PP reduced the mean numbers of hospital admissions and bed days compared with prior oral medication. LAIs may thus be cost effective in practice; its use bringing about cost reductions greater than its purchase cost.

摘要

目的

长效注射用抗精神病药物(LAI)是否优于口服抗精神病药物仍是一个有争议的问题,其结果因研究设计而异。我们进行这项研究是为了通过调查住院次数和住院天数,比较口服抗精神病药物与棕榈酸帕利哌酮(PP)在临床实践中的治疗效果。

方法

我们在一家医疗中心进行了一项回顾性观察镜像研究,查阅病历以获取临床数据。分析纳入了46例诊断为精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍且至少接受过两剂PP治疗的患者。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较开始使用PP前1年与使用后1年的住院天数和住院次数。

结果

每位患者的平均住院次数从0.83次降至0.17次(<0.0002),中位数从1次降至0次。平均住院天数显著减少,从24.85天降至8.74天(<0.006)。在设置不同镜像点的敏感性分析中,结果保持相似。

结论

我们的结果表明,与先前的口服药物相比,开始使用PP可减少平均住院次数和住院天数。因此,长效注射用抗精神病药物在实践中可能具有成本效益;其使用带来的成本降低大于其购买成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff7e/6852671/42b21435a8c0/cpn-17-531f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验