Ahmed Mariam A, Patel Chirag, Drezner Nicole, Helms Whitney, Tan Weiwei, Stypinski Daria
Center of Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration.
Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology, Takeda Pharmaceutical International Company Ltd.
Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jan;13(1):31-40. doi: 10.1111/cts.12703. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
Oncology drug development is among the most challenging of any therapeutic area, with first-in-human trials expected to deliver information on both safety and activity. Until recently, therapeutic approaches in oncology focused on cytotoxic chemotherapy agents, ruling out even the possibility of enrolling normal healthy volunteers (NHVs) in clinical trials due to safety considerations. The emergence of noncytotoxic modalities, including molecularly targeted agents with more favorable safety profiles, however, has led to increasing numbers of clinical pharmacology studies of these agents being conducted in NHVs. Beyond rapid enrollment and cost savings, there are other advantages of conducting specific types of studies in NHVs with the goal of more appropriate dosing decisions in certain subsets of the intended patient populations, allowing for enrollment of such patients in therapeutic trials from which they might otherwise have been excluded. Nevertheless, the decision must be carefully weighed against potential disadvantages, and although the considerations surrounding conduct of clinical trials using NHVs are generally well-defined in most other therapeutic areas, they are less well-defined in oncology.
肿瘤药物研发是所有治疗领域中最具挑战性的之一,首次人体试验预期能提供有关安全性和活性的信息。直到最近,肿瘤治疗方法主要集中在细胞毒性化疗药物上,出于安全考虑,在临床试验中招募正常健康志愿者(NHV)甚至都没有可能。然而,包括具有更有利安全性的分子靶向药物在内的非细胞毒性治疗方式的出现,使得越来越多针对这些药物的临床药理学研究在NHV中开展。除了快速入组和节省成本外,在NHV中开展特定类型的研究还有其他优势,目的是在特定预期患者群体子集中做出更合适的给药决策,从而使这些患者能够入组原本可能将他们排除在外的治疗试验。尽管如此,必须仔细权衡这一决定与潜在劣势,而且虽然在大多数其他治疗领域,围绕使用NHV进行临床试验的考量通常已明确界定,但在肿瘤学领域却界定得没那么清晰。