Hubei Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration of River-lakes and Algal Utilization, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430068, China; Department of Earth and Environmental Studies, Montclair State University, 1 Normal Ave., Montclair, NJ, 07043, United States.
Department of Earth and Environmental Studies, Montclair State University, 1 Normal Ave., Montclair, NJ, 07043, United States.
Chemosphere. 2020 Mar;242:125134. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125134. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
Traditional water treatment plants adopt multiple treatments to sequentially treat raw water for producing potable water. Besides complex treatment design and operation, they typically require a large space to accommodate different reactors. Furthermore, emerging issues (e.g. poor removal of persistent micro-pollutants) challenge the conventional treatment train. In this study, bench-scale tests were performed with real surface waters to evaluate ferrate(VI) treatment as a key alternative process for traditional water treatment. Of note, most earlier investigations on ferrate(VI) for water treatment utilized ferrate(VI) merely for pre- or post-treatment or simply as a disinfecting agent. Fundamentally different from the previous efforts, this study aimed to assess whether one-step ferrate(VI) addition, coupled with sedimentation, provided a comprehensive treatment, better than or equivalent to conventional surface water treatment. Results show that ferrate(VI) could simultaneously and effectively remove turbidity, degrade natural organic matter (NOM), and inactivate bacterial indicators in one single dose. The treatment performance relied heavily on ferrate(VI) dose and pH. Generally, higher ferrate(VI) dose improved the treatment results, except that it might re-suspend particles at a high dose at an alkaline condition. Lower pH favored coagulation due to reduction of zeta potentials on particle surface and promotion of their aggregation and enhanced the degradation of NOM because of higher Fe(VI) reactivity toward reductive moieties. In contrast, higher pH benefited the disinfection efficiency due to better stability and greater exposure of ferrate(VI). This study demonstrates that ferrate(VI) treatment can serve as a core treatment process in alternative water treatment designs for addressing various challenges.
传统的水处理厂采用多种处理方法对原水进行序批处理,以生产饮用水。除了复杂的处理设计和操作外,它们通常需要很大的空间来容纳不同的反应器。此外,新兴问题(例如持久性微污染物去除效果不佳)也对传统处理工艺提出了挑战。在这项研究中,使用实际地表水进行了台式测试,以评估高铁酸盐(VI)处理作为传统水处理的关键替代工艺。值得注意的是,大多数早期关于水处理用高铁酸盐(VI)的研究仅利用高铁酸盐(VI)进行预处理或后处理,或者仅将其用作消毒剂。与以往的研究工作截然不同,本研究旨在评估一步添加高铁酸盐(VI)并结合沉淀是否可以提供一种全面的处理方法,优于或等同于常规地表水的处理。结果表明,高铁酸盐(VI)可以一次性同时有效去除浊度、降解天然有机物(NOM)和灭活细菌指标。处理性能严重依赖于高铁酸盐(VI)的剂量和 pH 值。一般来说,较高的高铁酸盐(VI)剂量可以改善处理效果,但在碱性条件下高剂量可能会重新悬浮颗粒。较低的 pH 值有利于混凝,因为颗粒表面的 ζ 电位降低,促进了它们的聚集,并增强了 NOM 的降解,因为高铁酸盐(VI)对还原部分的反应性更高。相反,较高的 pH 值有利于消毒效率,因为高铁酸盐(VI)更稳定且暴露更多。本研究表明,高铁酸盐(VI)处理可以作为替代水处理设计中的核心处理工艺,以应对各种挑战。