• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

描述临床护理团队成员之间的沟通模式,以提供乳腺癌治疗。

Characterizing communication patterns among members of the clinical care team to deliver breast cancer treatment.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Feb 1;27(2):236-243. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz151.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocz151
PMID:31682267
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7647266/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Research to date focused on quantifying team collaboration has relied on identifying shared patients but does not incorporate the major role of communication patterns. The goal of this study was to describe the patterns and volume of communication among care team members involved in treating breast cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 4 years of communications data from the electronic health record between care team members at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC). Our cohort of patients diagnosed with breast cancer was identified using the VUMC tumor registry. We classified each care team member participating in electronic messaging by their institutional role and classified physicians by specialty. To identify collaborative patterns, we modeled the data as a social network.

RESULTS

Our cohort of 1181 patients was the subject of 322 424 messages sent in 104 210 unique communication threads by 5620 employees. On average, each patient was the subject of 88.2 message threads involving 106.4 employees. Each employee, on average, sent 72.9 messages and was connected to 24.6 collaborators. Nurses and physicians were involved in 98% and 44% of all message threads, respectively.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that many providers in our study may experience a high volume of messaging work. By using data routinely generated through interaction with the electronic health record, we can begin to evaluate how to iteratively implement and assess initiatives to improve the efficiency of care coordination and reduce unnecessary messaging work across all care team roles.

摘要

目的

迄今为止,有关团队协作的研究主要依赖于确定共享患者,但并未纳入沟通模式的主要作用。本研究的目的是描述参与治疗乳腺癌患者的护理团队成员之间的沟通模式和沟通量。

材料和方法

我们分析了范德比尔特大学医学中心(VUMC)电子健康记录中来自护理团队成员的 4 年沟通数据。我们使用 VUMC 肿瘤登记处确定了被诊断患有乳腺癌的患者队列。我们根据机构角色对参与电子消息传递的每个护理团队成员进行分类,并按专业对医生进行分类。为了识别协作模式,我们将数据建模为社交网络。

结果

我们的 1181 名患者队列是 322424 条消息的主题,这些消息是由 5620 名员工在 104210 个唯一的通信线程中发送的。平均而言,每个患者是涉及 106.4 名员工的 88.2 个消息线程的主题。平均而言,每个员工发送 72.9 条消息,与 24.6 个协作者相连。护士和医生分别参与了所有消息线程的 98%和 44%。

讨论和结论

我们的结果表明,我们研究中的许多提供者可能会经历大量的消息传递工作。通过使用通过与电子健康记录交互生成的数据,我们可以开始评估如何迭代地实施和评估旨在提高护理协调效率并减少所有护理团队角色中不必要的消息传递工作的举措。

相似文献

1
Characterizing communication patterns among members of the clinical care team to deliver breast cancer treatment.描述临床护理团队成员之间的沟通模式,以提供乳腺癌治疗。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Feb 1;27(2):236-243. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz151.
2
An Analysis of Electronic Health Record Work to Manage Asynchronous Clinical Messages among Breast Cancer Care Teams.电子健康记录在管理乳腺癌护理团队间异步临床信息中的应用分析。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Aug;12(4):877-887. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735257. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
3
Classification and analysis of asynchronous communication content between care team members involved in breast cancer treatment.参与乳腺癌治疗的护理团队成员之间异步通信内容的分类与分析。
JAMIA Open. 2021 Aug 12;4(3):ooab049. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab049. eCollection 2021 Jul.
4
Evaluating the Scope of Clinical Electronic Messaging to Coordinate Care in a Breast Cancer Cohort.评估临床电子通信在乳腺癌队列中协调护理的范围。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:808-812. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190335.
5
Characterizing the Patterns of Electronic Health Record-Integrated Secure Messaging Use: Cross-Sectional Study.描述电子健康记录集成安全消息使用模式:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 6;25:e48583. doi: 10.2196/48583.
6
Patient Centeredness in Electronic Communication: Evaluation of Patient-to-Health Care Team Secure Messaging.电子通信中的以患者为中心:对患者与医疗团队之间安全消息传递的评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 8;20(3):e82. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8801.
7
A web-based and mobile patient-centered ''microblog'' messaging platform to improve care team communication in acute care.一个基于网络和移动设备的、以患者为中心的“微博”消息传递平台,用于改善急性护理中的医护团队沟通。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e178-e184. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw110.
8
Electronic Medical Record-Based Electronic Messaging Among Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.基于电子病历的乳腺癌患者间电子信息交流:系统评价。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Jan;14(1):134-143. doi: 10.1055/a-2004-6669. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
9
Evaluation of a Secure Messaging System in the Care of Children With Medical Complexity: Mixed Methods Study.评估安全消息传递系统在照顾患有复杂疾病儿童中的应用:混合方法研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Feb 23;7:e42881. doi: 10.2196/42881.
10
Characterizing the Clamor: An In-Depth Analysis of Inpatient Paging Communication.剖析喧闹声:住院患者传呼通信的深入分析
Acad Med. 2016 Jul;91(7):1015-21. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001132.

引用本文的文献

1
Networked Behaviors Associated With a Large-Scale Secure Messaging Network: Cross-Sectional Secondary Data Analysis.与大规模安全消息网络相关的网络行为:横断面二次数据分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jul 10;13:e66544. doi: 10.2196/66544.
2
Workflow analysis of breast cancer treatment decision-making: challenges and opportunities for informatics to support patient-centered cancer care.乳腺癌治疗决策的工作流程分析:信息学支持以患者为中心的癌症护理面临的挑战与机遇
JAMIA Open. 2024 Jun 21;7(2):ooae053. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae053. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Patient care in complex Sociotechnological ecosystems and learning health systems.复杂社会技术生态系统和学习型卫生系统中的患者护理。
Learn Health Syst. 2024 May 23;8(Suppl 1):e10427. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10427. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Characterizing the Patterns of Electronic Health Record-Integrated Secure Messaging Use: Cross-Sectional Study.描述电子健康记录集成安全消息使用模式:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 6;25:e48583. doi: 10.2196/48583.
5
Managing Critical Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Oncology Settings: System Development and Retrospective Study.肿瘤环境中关键患者报告结局指标的管理:系统开发与回顾性研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Nov 3;10(11):e38483. doi: 10.2196/38483.
6
Using event logs to observe interactions with electronic health records: an updated scoping review shows increasing use of vendor-derived measures.利用事件日志观察与电子健康记录的交互:更新的范围综述显示,越来越多地使用供应商提供的指标。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Dec 13;30(1):144-154. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac177.
7
Patient Portal Messaging for Asynchronous Virtual Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Analysis.COVID-19大流行期间用于异步虚拟护理的患者门户消息传递:回顾性分析
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 May 5;9(2):e35187. doi: 10.2196/35187.
8
An Analysis of Electronic Health Record Work to Manage Asynchronous Clinical Messages among Breast Cancer Care Teams.电子健康记录在管理乳腺癌护理团队间异步临床信息中的应用分析。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Aug;12(4):877-887. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735257. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
9
Classification and analysis of asynchronous communication content between care team members involved in breast cancer treatment.参与乳腺癌治疗的护理团队成员之间异步通信内容的分类与分析。
JAMIA Open. 2021 Aug 12;4(3):ooab049. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab049. eCollection 2021 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Physicians' Well-Being Linked To In-Basket Messages Generated By Algorithms In Electronic Health Records.医生的幸福感与电子病历中算法生成的收件箱信息有关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jul;38(7):1073-1078. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05509.
2
Window of Opportunity: Patient Portals and Cancer.机遇之窗:患者门户网站与癌症
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Nov;14(11):639-641. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00464.
3
Improving Provider Experience and Increasing Patient Access Through Nurse Practitioner-Physician Primary Care Teams.通过执业护士-医生初级保健团队改善医疗服务提供者体验并增加患者就医机会。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2018 Oct/Dec;41(4):308-313. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000252.
4
Determining Burden of Commuting for Treatment Using Online Mapping Services - A Study of Breast Cancer Patients.使用在线地图服务确定治疗通勤负担——一项针对乳腺癌患者的研究
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:555-564. eCollection 2017.
5
Information technologies that facilitate care coordination: provider and patient perspectives.促进医疗协调的信息技术:提供者和患者的观点。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 May 23;8(3):522-525. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx086.
6
Applications of network analysis to routinely collected health care data: a systematic review.网络分析在常规医疗保健数据中的应用:系统综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Feb 1;25(2):210-221. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx052.
7
Cancer Care Coordination: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Over 30 Years of Empirical Studies.癌症护理协调:30 多年来实证研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Behav Med. 2017 Aug;51(4):532-546. doi: 10.1007/s12160-017-9876-2.
8
Care Coordination and Comprehensive Electronic Health Records are Associated With Increased Transition Planning Activities.护理协调和综合电子健康记录与增加过渡规划活动相关。
Acad Pediatr. 2018 Jan-Feb;18(1):111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
9
A Social Network Analysis of Cancer Provider Collaboration.癌症医疗服务提供者合作的社会网络分析
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017 Feb 10;2016:1987-1996. eCollection 2016.
10
Data Driven Approach to Burden of Treatment Measurement: A Study of Patients with Breast Cancer.基于数据驱动的治疗负担测量方法:一项乳腺癌患者研究
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017 Feb 10;2016:1756-1763. eCollection 2016.