负压伤口疗法和抗生素珠在下肢保肢中的疗效。

The Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Antibiotic Beads in Lower Extremity Salvage.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida.

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2020 Mar;247:499-507. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.09.055. Epub 2019 Nov 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic beads and negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) represent two methods of wound management used during staged debridement in the post-trauma limb salvage pathway. The efficacy of NPWT and antibiotic beads in preventing infection remains unclear.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of patients with traumatic lower extremity open fractures who received NPWT and/or antibiotic beads before soft tissue reconstruction at an urban level 1 trauma center between August 2007 and December 2015. Patients with wound infections before application of NPWT and/or antibiotic beads were excluded.

RESULTS

In 73 lower extremities requiring soft tissue coverage, 46 received antibiotic beads and 48 received NPWT. Overall infection rate was 15.1%. Use of antibiotic beads was associated with a decreased risk of infection (6.4% versus 30.7%; P = 0.01). Use of NPWT was associated with an increased risk of one or more complications (45.7% versus 4.2%; P = 0.001). The development of infection was associated with a greater period of time between application of antibiotic beads (22 ± 13 versus 12 ± 6 d, P = 0.01) or NPWT (23 ± 15 versus 10 ± 11 d, P = 0.004) and soft tissue coverage. Overall limb salvage rate was 95.9%; secondary amputation was associated with development of infection (P = 0.001) but not with use of NPWT or antibiotic beads.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic beads may prevent infections in patients awaiting soft tissue coverage of wounds. NPWT may contribute to a greater rate of complication. Limb salvage was successful in most cases regardless of method of wound management.

摘要

背景

抗生素珠和负压伤口治疗(NPWT)是创伤后肢体保肢途径中分期清创时使用的两种伤口管理方法。NPWT 和抗生素珠在预防感染方面的效果尚不清楚。

方法

这是一项对 2007 年 8 月至 2015 年 12 月在城市一级创伤中心接受 NPWT 和/或抗生素珠治疗,然后进行软组织重建的创伤性下肢开放性骨折患者的回顾性研究。排除 NPWT 和/或抗生素珠应用前发生伤口感染的患者。

结果

在 73 个需要软组织覆盖的下肢中,46 个接受了抗生素珠治疗,48 个接受了 NPWT。总感染率为 15.1%。使用抗生素珠与感染风险降低相关(6.4%比 30.7%;P=0.01)。使用 NPWT 与发生一种或多种并发症的风险增加相关(45.7%比 4.2%;P=0.001)。感染的发生与抗生素珠(22±13 比 12±6 d,P=0.01)或 NPWT(23±15 比 10±11 d,P=0.004)与软组织覆盖之间的时间间隔较长有关。总的肢体保肢率为 95.9%;二次截肢与感染的发生有关(P=0.001),但与 NPWT 或抗生素珠的使用无关。

结论

抗生素珠可能预防等待伤口软组织覆盖的患者发生感染。NPWT 可能会导致更高的并发症发生率。无论采用何种伤口处理方法,大多数情况下都能成功保肢。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索