Suppr超能文献

VetScan cPL快速检测的部分分析验证

Partial analytical validation of the VetScan cPL rapid test.

作者信息

Steiner Joerg M, Guadiano Phillip, Gomez Robynne R, Suchodolski Jan S, Lidbury Jonathan A

机构信息

Gastrointestinal Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

出版信息

Vet Clin Pathol. 2019 Dec;48(4):683-690. doi: 10.1111/vcp.12796. Epub 2019 Nov 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Serum canine pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity (cPLI) concentrations have become the standard laboratory test used to diagnose canine pancreatitis. Recently, a new point-of-care assay for cPLI, the VetScan cPL rapid test (VetScan cPL), has become available, but analytical validation data have not yet been published.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to perform a partial analytical validation of the VetScan cPL.

METHODS

Leftover serum samples from a diagnostic laboratory were used. Adherence to the manufacturer's guidelines, linearity, repeatability, and reproducibility were evaluated. Results of the VetScan cPL were correlated with the Spec cPL results.

RESULTS

Observed-to-expected ratios for dilutional parallelism ranged from 77.4% to 162.9% (mean 119.3%). Intra-assay and inter-assay variabilities ranged from 16.9% to 36.7% (mean 25.1%) and from 14.1% to 51.2% (mean 31.8%), respectively. Adherence to the manufacturer's specification regarding results within ± 60 µg/L of the Spec cPL result was only achieved for 39% of the measurements. The VetScan cPL and Spec cPL correlation showed a Spearman's r of .758 for 29 data pairs.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the conditions of this study, the VetScan cPL did not adhere to the manufacturer's specifications for most measurements. Also, the VetScan cPL showed suboptimal linearity and was not precise. In conclusion, the VetScan cPL failed basic analytical validation.

摘要

背景

血清犬胰脂肪酶免疫反应性(cPLI)浓度已成为诊断犬胰腺炎的标准实验室检测方法。最近,一种新的即时检测cPLI的方法,即VetScan cPL快速检测(VetScan cPL)已经可用,但分析验证数据尚未公布。

目的

本研究旨在对VetScan cPL进行部分分析验证。

方法

使用诊断实验室剩余的血清样本。评估其是否符合制造商的指南、线性、重复性和再现性。将VetScan cPL的结果与Spec cPL的结果进行相关性分析。

结果

稀释平行性的观察值与预期值之比在77.4%至162.9%之间(平均为119.3%)。批内和批间变异分别在16.9%至36.7%之间(平均为25.1%)和14.1%至51.2%之间(平均为31.8%)。在Spec cPL结果的±60µg/L范围内,只有39%的测量结果符合制造商的规格。对于29对数据,VetScan cPL与Spec cPL的相关性显示Spearman's r为0.758。

结论

在本研究条件下,VetScan cPL在大多数测量中不符合制造商的规格。此外,VetScan cPL的线性不理想且不精确。总之,VetScan cPL未能通过基本的分析验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f00b/6973129/89bbda10394a/VCP-48-683-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验