Suppr超能文献

支持能力评估和实现的发展轨迹:阐述护士从业者(MR-NP)项目课程的精通量表。

A developmental trajectory supporting the evaluation and achievement of competencies: Articulating the Mastery Rubric for the nurse practitioner (MR-NP) program curriculum.

机构信息

Collaborative for Research on Outcomes and -Metrics, and Departments of Neurology, Biostatistics, Bioinformatics & Biomathematics, and Rehabilitation Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., United States of America.

Department of Advanced Nursing Practice, School of Nursing & Health Studies, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Nov 7;14(11):e0224593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224593. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advanced practice registered nursing (APRN) competencies exist, but there is no structure supporting the operationalization of the competencies by APRN educators. The development of a Mastery Rubric (MR) for APRNs provides a developmental trajectory that supports educational institutions, educators, students, and APRNs. A MR describes the explicit knowledge, skills, and abilities as performed by the individual moving from novice (student) through graduation and into the APRN career.

METHOD

A curriculum development tool, the Mastery Rubric (MR), was created to structure the curriculum and career of the nurse practitioner (NP), the MR-NP. Cognitive task analysis (CTA) yielded the first of the three required elements for any MR: a list of knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) to be established through the curriculum. The European guild structure and Bloom's taxonomy of cognitive behaviors provided the second element of the MR, the specific developmental stages that are relevant for the curriculum. The Body of Work method of standard setting was used to create the third required element of the MR, performance level descriptors (PLDs) for each KSA at each of these stages. Although the CTA was informed by the competencies, it was still necessary to formally assess the alignment of competencies with the resulting KSAs; this was achieved via Degrees of Freedom Analysis (DoFA). Validity evidence was obtained from this Analysis and from the DoFA of the KSAs' alignment with principles of andragogy, and with learning outcomes assessment criteria. These analyses are the first time the national competencies for the NP have been evaluated in this manner.

RESULTS

CTA of the 43 NP Competencies led to seven KSAs that support a developmental trajectory for instruction and documenting achievement towards independent performance on the competencies. The Competencies were objectively evaluable for the first time since their publication due to the psychometric validity attributes of the PLD-derived developmental trajectory. Three qualitatively distinct performance levels for the independent practitioner make the previously implicit developmental requirements of the competencies explicit for the first time.

DISCUSSION

The MR-NP provides the first articulated and observable developmental trajectory for the NP competencies, during and beyond the formal curriculum. A focus on psychometric validity was brought to bear on how learners would demonstrate their development, and ultimately their achievement, of the competencies. The MR-NP goes beyond the competencies with trajectories and PLDs that can engage both learner and instructor in this developmental process throughout the career.

摘要

背景

高级实践注册护士(APRN)的能力已经存在,但没有结构来支持 APRN 教育者对这些能力的实施。为 APRN 开发掌握量表(MR)提供了一个发展轨迹,支持教育机构、教育者、学生和 APRN。MR 描述了个体从新手(学生)到毕业并进入 APRN 职业的明确知识、技能和能力。

方法

开发了一种课程开发工具,即掌握量表(MR),以构建护士从业者(NP)的课程和职业,即 MR-NP。认知任务分析(CTA)产生了任何 MR 的三个必需元素中的第一个:通过课程建立的知识、技能和能力(KSAs)列表。欧洲行会结构和布鲁姆的认知行为分类法为 MR 的第二个元素提供了依据,即与课程相关的特定发展阶段。使用工作标准设定的方法来创建 MR 的第三个必需元素,即每个 KSA 在这些阶段的绩效水平描述符(PLD)。尽管 CTA 是由能力驱动的,但仍有必要正式评估能力与由此产生的 KSAs 的一致性;这是通过自由度分析(DoFA)实现的。从这项分析以及从 KSAs 与成人教育原则和学习成果评估标准的一致性的 DoFA 中获得了有效性证据。这些分析是首次以这种方式评估 NP 的国家能力。

结果

对 43 项 NP 能力的 CTA 导致了七个 KSAs,这些 KSAs 支持了一个发展轨迹,用于指导和记录在能力上实现独立表现的成就。由于 PLD 衍生的发展轨迹的心理测量有效性属性,能力自发布以来首次具有了可客观评估的特征。对于独立从业者的三种截然不同的绩效水平使能力的先前隐含的发展要求首次变得明确。

讨论

MR-NP 为 NP 能力提供了第一个在正式课程期间和之后体现和可观察的发展轨迹。对学习者将如何展示他们对能力的发展以及最终实现能力的关注重点是心理测量有效性。MR-NP 超越了能力,提供了轨迹和 PLD,可以在整个职业生涯中使学习者和教育者都参与到这个发展过程中。

相似文献

2
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
3
The Mastery Rubric for Bioinformatics: A tool to support design and evaluation of career-spanning education and training.
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 26;14(11):e0225256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225256. eCollection 2019.
4
The Mastery Rubric for Evidence-Based Medicine: Institutional Validation via Multidimensional Scaling.
Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(2):152-65. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1146599.
5
8
Evaluation of the clinical hour requirement and attainment of core clinical competencies by nurse practitioner students.
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2012 Sep;24(9):544-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00730.x. Epub 2012 May 2.
9
Determining nurse practitioner core competencies using a Delphi approach.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2020 Mar;32(3):200-217. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000384.
10
Competency-based curriculum in nurse practitioner education.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2024 Jan 1;36(1):23-28. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000928.

引用本文的文献

1
A Sisyphean task: Developing and revising public health nursing competencies.
Public Health Nurs. 2022 Sep;39(5):1078-1088. doi: 10.1111/phn.13077. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
2
Editorial: Curriculum Applications in Microbiology: Bioinformatics in the Classroom.
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jul 1;12:705233. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.705233. eCollection 2021.
3
The Mastery Rubric for Bioinformatics: A tool to support design and evaluation of career-spanning education and training.
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 26;14(11):e0225256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225256. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

2
Nurse practitioner residency programs and transition to practice.
Nurs Forum. 2018 Apr;53(2):156-160. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12237. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
3
Overarching challenges to the implementation of competency-based medical education.
Med Teach. 2017 Jun;39(6):588-593. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315075.
4
Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education.
Med Teach. 2017 Jun;39(6):609-616. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315082.
5
A call to action: The controversy of and rationale for competency-based medical education.
Med Teach. 2017 Jun;39(6):574-581. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315067.
6
Toward a shared language for competency-based medical education.
Med Teach. 2017 Jun;39(6):582-587. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315066.
7
Educational Changes to Support Advanced Practice Nursing Education.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2016 Jul-Sep;30(3):187-90. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000201.
8
Applying, Evaluating and Refining Bioinformatics Core Competencies (An Update from the Curriculum Task Force of ISCB's Education Committee).
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 May 13;12(5):e1004943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004943. eCollection 2016 May.
9
The Mastery Rubric for Evidence-Based Medicine: Institutional Validation via Multidimensional Scaling.
Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(2):152-65. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1146599.
10
A Mastery Rubric: guiding curriculum design, admissions and development of course objectives.
Assess Eval High Educ. 2010;35(1):15-32. doi: 10.1080/02602930802474169. Epub 2009 Jan 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验