Suppr超能文献

[接触二氧化硅和2,2-二氯-1,1,1-三氟乙烷(HCFC-123)所致肝损伤:一例报告]

[Liver injury caused by exposure to silica and 2,2-dichloro-1,1,1-trifluoroethane (HCFC-123):a case report].

作者信息

Fukushima Hirofumi, Kubo Yasuhiko, Matsugaki Satoru, Sakemi Ryosuke, Sakakibara Shigenari, Morimitsu Yosuke

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Tobata Kyoritsu Hospital.

Division of Pathology, Tobata Kyoritsu Hospital.

出版信息

Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2019;116(11):944-951. doi: 10.11405/nisshoshi.116.944.

Abstract

This case report presents two males with drug-induced liver injury acquired from working at a glass factory dealing with silica and 2,2-dichloro-1,1,1-trifluoroethane (HCFC-123). Within one month of work, both patients presented with fever, icterus with liver dysfunction, and eosinophilia. Case 1 had experienced recurrence of symptoms twice while working and showed positive results for the drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST). Meanwhile, case 2 was diagnosed by liver biopsy and clinical course but was negative for DLST. Hazard of exposure to non-crystalline silica is low, but drug-induced liver injury after exposure to HCFC-123 has been reported. Allergic liver injury is also caused by chemical substances;however, the insight into whether this injury is caused by exposure to silica or HCFC-123 remains unclear. Further studies are required to examine the influence of silica and HCFC-123 on drug-induced liver injury among glass-factory employees.

摘要

本病例报告介绍了两名男性,他们在一家处理二氧化硅和2,2 - 二氯 - 1,1,1 - 三氟乙烷(HCFC - 123)的玻璃厂工作时患上了药物性肝损伤。在工作一个月内,两名患者均出现发热、黄疸伴肝功能障碍以及嗜酸性粒细胞增多。病例1在工作期间症状复发两次,药物诱导淋巴细胞刺激试验(DLST)结果呈阳性。与此同时,病例2通过肝活检和临床病程确诊,但DLST结果为阴性。接触非晶态二氧化硅的危害较低,但已有接触HCFC - 123后发生药物性肝损伤的报道。过敏性肝损伤也由化学物质引起;然而,这种损伤是否由接触二氧化硅或HCFC - 123所致仍不清楚。需要进一步研究以考察二氧化硅和HCFC - 123对玻璃厂员工药物性肝损伤的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验