Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗临床Ⅰ期上皮性卵巢癌的生存结局比较。

Survival outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus traditional laparoscopy in clinical stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.

机构信息

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;222(5):474.e1-474.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.10.104. Epub 2019 Nov 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The US Food and Drug Administration recently called for studies addressing long-term survival after robotic-assisted laparoscopy in oncologic settings. Long-term clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopy among ovarian cancer patients are understudied.

OBJECTIVE(S): To investigate the long-term mortality of robotic-assisted laparoscopy compared to traditional laparoscopy for clinical stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using data from the National Cancer Database, we identified a total of 1901 patients who received minimally invasive surgery (ie, robotic-assisted laparoscopy or traditional laparoscopy) for clinical stage I epithelial ovarian cancer between 2010 and 2014. Multivariable logistic or linear regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the short-term outcomes, including conversion-to-open surgery, number of lymph nodes examined, length of hospitalization, unplanned 30-day readmission, and 30- and 90-day mortality. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to derive adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for 1-, 3-, and 5-year total mortality associated with surgical approaches. Covariates adjusted for included age, tumor size and upstaging, number of lymph nodes evaluated, time from diagnosis to surgery, length of hospitalization, histologic subtype, insurance status, region, distance to care, surgical procedure type, and hospital experience with these procedures.

RESULTS

Compared to traditional laparoscopy, robotic-assisted laparoscopy was less likely to result in conversion-to-open surgery (conversion rate: 7.2% versus 17.9%, P < .001; adjusted odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.73). In multivariable analyses, there were no significant differences in survival between robotic-assisted laparoscopy- and traditional laparoscopy-treated patients. Compared with traditional laparoscopy, the adjusted hazard ratios for 1-, 3-, and 5-year mortality were 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.43-2.18), 0.68 (95% confidence interval, 0.43-1.08), and 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.16), respectively.

CONCLUSION(S): Robotic-assisted laparoscopy had comparable overall mortality in comparison to traditional laparoscopy when treating clinical stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.

摘要

背景

美国食品和药物管理局最近呼吁开展研究,探讨在肿瘤学环境下机器人辅助腹腔镜手术后的长期生存情况。机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗卵巢癌患者的长期临床结局仍研究不足。

目的

调查机器人辅助腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗临床 I 期上皮性卵巢癌的长期死亡率。

材料和方法

利用国家癌症数据库的数据,我们共纳入了 1901 例于 2010 年至 2014 年期间接受微创治疗(即机器人辅助腹腔镜手术或传统腹腔镜手术)的临床 I 期上皮性卵巢癌患者。采用多变量逻辑或线性回归分析评估短期结局,包括中转开腹手术、检查的淋巴结数目、住院时间、非计划 30 天内再入院率,以及 30 天和 90 天死亡率。采用多变量 Cox 比例风险模型计算与手术方式相关的 1 年、3 年和 5 年总死亡率的调整后危险比和 95%置信区间。调整后的协变量包括年龄、肿瘤大小和分期升级、检查的淋巴结数目、诊断至手术的时间、住院时间、组织学亚型、保险状况、地区、距医疗机构的距离、手术类型以及医院开展这些手术的经验。

结果

与传统腹腔镜手术相比,机器人辅助腹腔镜手术中转开腹手术的可能性较小(中转率:7.2%比 17.9%,P<0.001;调整后比值比,0.49;95%置信区间,0.33-0.73)。在多变量分析中,机器人辅助腹腔镜手术和传统腹腔镜手术治疗患者的生存情况无显著差异。与传统腹腔镜手术相比,1 年、3 年和 5 年死亡率的调整后危险比分别为 0.97(95%置信区间,0.43-2.18)、0.68(95%置信区间,0.43-1.08)和 0.78(95%置信区间,0.53-1.16)。

结论

在治疗临床 I 期上皮性卵巢癌时,机器人辅助腹腔镜手术的总体死亡率与传统腹腔镜手术相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验