Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Jun;23(2):295-302. doi: 10.1038/s41391-019-0185-7. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
Genomic classifiers (GC) have been shown to improve risk stratification post prostatectomy. However, their clinical benefit has not been prospectively demonstrated. We sought to determine the impact of GC testing on postoperative management in men with prostate cancer post prostatectomy.
Two prospective registries of prostate cancer patients treated between 2014 and 2019 were included. All men underwent Decipher tumor testing for adverse features post prostatectomy (Decipher Biosciences, San Diego, CA). The clinical utility cohort, which measured the change in treatment decision-making, captured pre- and postgenomic treatment recommendations from urologists across diverse practice settings (n = 3455). The clinical benefit cohort, which examined the difference in outcome, was from a single academic institution whose tumor board predefined "best practices" based on GC results (n = 135).
In the clinical utility cohort, providers' recommendations pregenomic testing were primarily observation (69%). GC testing changed recommendations for 39% of patients, translating to a number needed to test of 3 to change one treatment decision. In the clinical benefit cohort, 61% of patients had genomic high-risk tumors; those who received the recommended adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) had 2-year PSA recurrence of 3 vs. 25% for those who did not (HR 0.1 [95% CI 0.0-0.6], p = 0.013). For the genomic low/intermediate-risk patients, 93% followed recommendations for observation, with similar 2-year PSA recurrence rates compared with those who received ART (p = 0.93).
The use of GC substantially altered treatment decision-making, with a number needed to test of only 3. Implementing best practices to routinely recommend ART for genomic-high patients led to larger than expected improvements in early biochemical endpoints, without jeopardizing outcomes for genomic-low/intermediate-risk patients.
基因组分类器(GC)已被证明可改善前列腺切除术后的风险分层。然而,其临床获益尚未得到前瞻性证实。我们旨在确定 GC 检测对前列腺癌患者前列腺切除术后的术后管理的影响。
纳入了 2014 年至 2019 年期间治疗的前列腺癌患者的两个前瞻性登记处。所有男性均接受了前列腺切除术后的 Decipher 肿瘤检测(Decipher Biosciences,圣地亚哥,CA)。临床实用性队列旨在衡量治疗决策的变化,该队列从不同实践环境中的泌尿科医生那里捕获了基因组前和后治疗建议(n=3455)。临床获益队列旨在研究结果的差异,该队列来自一个单一的学术机构,该机构的肿瘤委员会根据 GC 结果预设了“最佳实践”(n=135)。
在临床实用性队列中,基因组前检测时,医生的建议主要是观察(69%)。GC 检测改变了 39%患者的建议,这意味着需要检测 3 次才能改变一次治疗决策。在临床获益队列中,61%的患者具有基因组高危肿瘤;接受推荐的辅助放疗(ART)的患者 2 年 PSA 复发率为 3%,而未接受 ART 的患者为 25%(HR 0.1[95%CI 0.0-0.6],p=0.013)。对于基因组低/中危患者,93%的患者遵循观察建议,与接受 ART 的患者相比,其 2 年 PSA 复发率相似(p=0.93)。
GC 的使用极大地改变了治疗决策,仅需检测 3 次即可改变决策。为了常规推荐基因组高患者接受 ART,实施最佳实践,可使早期生化终点得到显著改善,而不会危及基因组低/中危患者的预后。