Durand R P, Levine J H, Lichtenstein L S, Fleming G A, Ross G R
Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425-2920.
Med Educ. 1988 Jul;22(4):335-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1988.tb00762.x.
Twenty senior teachers were asked to rank, in order of influence, the seven clinical and five personal characteristics used to grade third-year medicine clerks. Seventeen perceived themselves to be more influenced by clinical characteristics when assigning grades. Independently, the actual ratings completed over a 3-year period by these same teachers were analysed to measure the congruency between their perceived and actual grading behaviour. When actually rating students only nine raters were more influenced by clinical characteristics and just one half of the teachers displayed a congruency between their perceived and actual rating behaviour. The implications of these findings are discussed.
二十位资深教师被要求按照影响力大小对用于给医学三年级实习生评分的七个临床特征和五个个人特征进行排序。十七位教师认为自己在评分时受临床特征的影响更大。另外,对这些教师在三年时间内完成的实际评分进行了独立分析,以衡量他们感知到的评分行为与实际评分行为之间的一致性。在实际给学生评分时,只有九位评分者受临床特征的影响更大,并且只有一半的教师在其感知到的评分行为与实际评分行为之间表现出一致性。本文讨论了这些发现的意义。