Mills James
Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2020 Feb;79:101190. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2019.101190. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
In the months before and after the final surrender of Nazi Germany on 8 May 1945, British aviation medicine specialists were sent to the European continent to learn the progress that German aviation medicine had made since September 1939. For the medical officers at the Royal Air Force Institute of Aviation Medicine at Farnborough in Hampshire, the dilemma over whether the medical data from the Nazi aviation medicine experiments at Dachau concentration camp should be exploited presented profound moral and ethical problems. Their deliberations paralleled those of the 1945-46 Nuremberg Trial, which revealed the crimes that were committed under the Nazi regime. At the same time, the British medical establishment debated the morality of publishing the Nazi medical research to serve humanity. This article shows that on the basis of British wartime and post-war research, and determinations that were made by the British Advisory Committee for the Investigation of German Medical War Crimes, by 1948 the RAF IAM had essentially rejected the results of the Nazi aviation medicine experiments on scientific and ethical grounds.
在纳粹德国于1945年5月8日最终投降前后的几个月里,英国航空医学专家被派往欧洲大陆,去了解自1939年9月以来德国航空医学所取得的进展。对于位于汉普郡法恩伯勒的皇家空军航空医学研究所的医务人员来说,是否利用达豪集中营纳粹航空医学实验的医学数据这一困境,带来了深刻的道德和伦理问题。他们的思考与1945年至1946年的纽伦堡审判类似,该审判揭露了纳粹政权下所犯下的罪行。与此同时,英国医学界也在讨论公布纳粹医学研究成果以造福人类的道德性。本文表明,根据英国战时和战后的研究,以及英国德国医学战争罪行调查咨询委员会所做出的判定,到1948年时,皇家空军航空医学研究所已基于科学和伦理理由基本摒弃了纳粹航空医学实验的结果。