Gülşen Secaattin, Çikrikçi Sercan
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Dr Ersin Arslan Training And Research Hospital.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yozgat State Hospital, Yozgat, Turkey.
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Jun;31(4):919-923. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006039.
Adenoidectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in children in otorhinolaryngology practice. This study aims to compare the conventional curettage adenoidectomy (CCA) and the endoscope-assisted coblation adenoidectomy (EACA) in terms of the postoperative Eustachian tube function and the surgical outcomes.
A prospective, randomized, controlled study was carried out at a tertiary referral center and private hospital. Seventy-two adenoid hypertrophy patients without middle ear disease were randomly assigned to 2 groups to be operated via CCA and EACA techniques prior to surgery. Parameters including middle ear pressure values (MEPV), operative time, intraoperative hemorrhage, postoperative residual adenoid tissue, and postoperative pain were compared between groups.
In the CCA group for both ears, there was a statistically significant difference between preoperative mean MEPV and mean MEPV of postoperative day 1, while MEPV returned to normal ranges at the postoperative day 7. No statistically significant differences were observed in mean MEPV on preoperatively and 1st and 7th postoperative days in the EACA group for both right and left ears. Mean operative time was significantly higher in the EACA group compared to the CCA group (P < 0.001). Eight (22.2%) out of 36 patients who underwent CCA had a residual adenoid tissue postoperatively, while there was no residual adenoid tissue in any patients who operated via the EACA technique. Mean pain score on postoperative day 1 and 2 and blood loss were significantly less in the EACA group than the CCA group.
Endoscope-assisted coblation adenoidectomy may serve a reasonable alternative to conventional curettage adenoidectomy because it provides Eustachian tube functions preserved, decreased intraoperative hemorrhage, complete resection of the adenoid tissue, and lower pain score.
腺样体切除术是耳鼻喉科临床中最常见的儿童外科手术之一。本研究旨在比较传统刮除腺样体切除术(CCA)和内镜辅助下低温等离子腺样体切除术(EACA)在术后咽鼓管功能和手术效果方面的差异。
在一家三级转诊中心和私立医院进行了一项前瞻性、随机对照研究。72例无中耳疾病的腺样体肥大患者在手术前被随机分为两组,分别采用CCA和EACA技术进行手术。比较两组患者的中耳压力值(MEPV)、手术时间、术中出血、术后残留腺样体组织及术后疼痛等参数。
在CCA组双耳中,术前平均MEPV与术后第1天的平均MEPV之间存在统计学显著差异,而MEPV在术后第7天恢复到正常范围。EACA组双耳术前、术后第1天和第7天的平均MEPV均未观察到统计学显著差异。EACA组的平均手术时间显著高于CCA组(P<0.001)。36例接受CCA手术的患者中有8例(22.2%)术后有残留腺样体组织,而采用EACA技术手术的患者均无残留腺样体组织。EACA组术后第1天和第2天的平均疼痛评分及失血量均显著低于CCA组。
内镜辅助下低温等离子腺样体切除术可作为传统刮除腺样体切除术的合理替代方法,因为它能保留咽鼓管功能、减少术中出血、完整切除腺样体组织并降低疼痛评分。