骨端干预对双膦酸盐相关性非典型股骨骨折愈合的疗效。
Efficacy of bone-end intervention on fracture healing in bisphosphonate-related atypical femoral fractures.
机构信息
Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Mugla, Mentese, 48000, Turkey.
Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Mugla, Mentese, 48000, Turkey.
出版信息
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Feb;106(1):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.07.028. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
BACKGROUND
Delayed unions are quite common in the treatment of atypical femur fractures, which are thought to result from the long-term use of bisphosphonates. The effects of interventions for sclerotic tissue on the fracture line in atypical femoral fractures are not fully known. For this reason, we compared the results of patients with atypical femoral fractures treated by closed intramedullary nailing to patients treated by open surgery accompanied with interventions for their sclerotic bone ends, aiming to answer: (1) In the treatment of atypical femoral fractures, do bone-end interventions have a positive effect on the radiological union rate and radiological union time? (2) Do bone-end interventions influence complication rates in the treatment of atypical femoral fractures?
HYPOTHESIS
Bone-end interventions provide a faster and higher rate of union compared to closed intramedullary nailing and result in fewer complications in atypical femoral fractures.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A total of 32 patients who met the inclusion criteria and had atypical femoral fractures treated by intramedullary nailing between 01/01/2012 and 12/31/2016 were reviewed. Of these, 15 fractures were treated with intramedullary nailing (Group 1), and 17 were treated with open surgery and drilling of the bone ends followed by intramedullary nailing (Group 2). Demographic data, laboratory values, radiological union times, and complications were compared between the groups. Nonunion was defined as fractures with a persistent fracture line 12 months after surgery without any sign of union.
RESULTS
A similar rate of primary union was obtained in both groups (Group 1, 13/15 [87%]; Group 2, 16/17 [94%]; p=0.471). The mean radiological consolidation period was shorter in Group 2 (Group 1, 6.8±1.8 months; Group 2, 5.1±1.3 months; p=0.004). Nonunion rates were similar between the groups (Group 1, 1/15 [7%]; Group 2, 1/17 [6%]; p=0.927). For 1 patient in Group 1, a femoral neck fracture occurred 10 months after surgery, and a revision was performed with a long femoral stem.
DISCUSSION
In the treatment of atypical femoral fractures with intramedullary nailing, we found that the patients who were treated with open intervention of the bone ends had similar union and complication rates to those treated with closed methods, but radiological union time was found to be shorter in the open-intervention group.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
III, retrospective case-control study.
背景
在治疗非典型股骨骨折时,延迟愈合较为常见,这被认为是长期使用双膦酸盐的结果。对于非典型股骨骨折中硬化组织对骨折线的影响,我们还不完全了解。因此,我们比较了经闭合髓内钉治疗的非典型股骨骨折患者和接受开放手术并伴有骨端硬化干预的患者的结果,旨在回答以下两个问题:(1)在治疗非典型股骨骨折时,骨端干预对影像学愈合率和影像学愈合时间是否有积极影响?(2)骨端干预是否会影响非典型股骨骨折的并发症发生率?
假设
与闭合髓内钉相比,骨端干预可提供更快、更高的愈合率,并减少非典型股骨骨折的并发症。
患者和方法
共回顾了 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间接受髓内钉治疗的符合纳入标准且患有非典型股骨骨折的 32 名患者。其中,15 例骨折采用髓内钉治疗(1 组),17 例采用开放手术和骨端钻孔后髓内钉治疗(2 组)。比较两组的一般资料、实验室值、影像学愈合时间和并发症。术后 12 个月仍存在骨折线且无愈合迹象的定义为骨折不愈合。
结果
两组的初次愈合率相似(1 组 13/15 [87%];2 组 16/17 [94%];p=0.471)。2 组的影像学愈合时间较短(1 组 6.8±1.8 个月;2 组 5.1±1.3 个月;p=0.004)。两组的不愈合率相似(1 组 1/15 [7%];2 组 1/17 [6%];p=0.927)。1 组 1 例患者术后 10 个月发生股骨颈骨折,行翻修术,使用长股骨柄。
讨论
在使用髓内钉治疗非典型股骨骨折时,我们发现经骨端开放干预治疗的患者与经闭合方法治疗的患者具有相似的愈合率和并发症发生率,但开放干预组的影像学愈合时间较短。
证据等级
III 级,回顾性病例对照研究。