Shahbazian Hodjatollah, Bakhshali Roksana, Shamsi Azin, Bagheri Ali
Department of Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Interventional Radiotherapy Ward, Department of Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Brachytherapy. 2020 Mar-Apr;19(2):264-274. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
To dosimetrically compare interstitial brachytherapy (MIBT) vs. EBRT (3DCRT and high-energy electron beams) for deep-seated tumor bed boosts (depth ≥4 cm) in early-stage breast cancer.
Planning CTs of fifteen left-side breast cancer patients previously treated with MIBT boost chosen for this study. MIBT, 3DCRT (three-field technique), and enface high-energy electron (15-18 MeV) plans retrospectively generated on these images. To minimize intrapatient target contour inconsistency, due to a technical limitation for transferring identical contours from brachytherapy to EBRT planning system, spherical volumes delineated as hypothetical CTVs (CTV-H) (depth ≥4 cm with considering the geometry of the brachytherapy implant) instead of original lumpectomy cavities (which had irregular contours). In EBRT, PTV-H=CTV-H+5 mm. To account for beam penumbra, additional PTV-H to beam-edge margins added (3DCRT = 5 mm; electron = 10 mm). Included organs at risk (OARs) were ipsilateral breast, skin, ribs, lung, and heart. Prescribed dose-fractionations were 12 Gy/3fractions (MIBT) and 16 Gy/8fractions (EBRT) (BED = 24 Gy, breast cancer Alpha/Beta = 4 Gy). Biologically equivalent DVH parameters for all techniques compared.
Mean CTV-H depth was 6 cm. Normal breast V-V; skin V-V; rib V-V; lung V-V; heart V; mean lung dose; ribs/lung D were lower in MIBT vs. 3CDRT. MIBT reduced breast V-V; skin V-V; rib V-V and V; lung V-V; heart V-V; skin/ribs/lung D compared to electrons. In contrast, breast V-V and V-V were increased in MIBT vs. 3DCRT and electron plans, respectively. Electron plans had the minimum mean heart dose.
From a dosimetric point of view, in deeply-seated lumpectomy beds, MIBT boost better protects OARs from exposure to medium and high doses of radiation compared to 3DCRT and high energy electron beams (except more ipsilateral breast hot spots).
通过剂量学比较间质近距离放疗(MIBT)与外照射放疗(3DCRT和高能电子束)用于早期乳腺癌深部瘤床加量照射(深度≥4 cm)的情况。
选择15例先前接受过MIBT加量照射的左侧乳腺癌患者的计划CT用于本研究。在这些图像上回顾性生成MIBT、3DCRT(三野技术)和正面高能电子(15 - 18 MeV)计划。由于从近距离放疗计划系统向EBRT计划系统传输相同轮廓存在技术限制,为尽量减少患者内靶区轮廓不一致,将球形体积描绘为假设的临床靶区(CTV-H)(考虑近距离放疗植入物的几何形状,深度≥4 cm),而非原始的保乳手术腔(其轮廓不规则)。在EBRT中,计划靶区(PTV-H)=临床靶区(CTV-H)+5 mm。为考虑射束半值层,向射束边缘添加额外的PTV-H边界(3DCRT = 5 mm;电子束 = 10 mm)。纳入的危及器官(OARs)包括同侧乳腺、皮肤、肋骨、肺和心脏。规定的剂量分割为12 Gy/3次分割(MIBT)和16 Gy/8次分割(EBRT)(生物等效剂量(BED)= 24 Gy,乳腺癌α/β = 4 Gy)。比较所有技术的生物等效剂量体积直方图(DVH)参数。
CTV-H的平均深度为6 cm。与3DCRT相比,MIBT的正常乳腺V-V、皮肤V-V、肋骨V-V、肺V-V、心脏V、平均肺剂量、肋骨/肺剂量较低。与电子束相比,MIBT降低了结膜囊V-V、皮肤V-V、肋骨V-V和V、肺V-V、心脏V-V、皮肤/肋骨/肺剂量。相比之下,与3DCRT和电子束计划相比,MIBT的乳腺V-V和V-V分别增加。电子束计划的平均心脏剂量最低。
从剂量学角度来看,在深部保乳手术床中,与3DCRT和高能电子束相比,MIBT加量照射能更好地保护危及器官免受中高剂量辐射暴露(除同侧乳腺更多热点外)。