Xu Chang, Wang Yuxiang, Hauser Steven C, Gerling Gregory J
University of Virginia, VA, USA.
Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2018;62(1):1535-1539. doi: 10.1177/1541931218621347. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
In our ability to discriminate compliant, or 'soft,' objects, we rely upon information acquired from interactions at the finger pad. We have yet to resolve the most pertinent perceptual cues. However, doing so is vital for building effective, dynamic displays. By introducing psychophysical illusions through spheres of various size and elasticity, we investigate the utility of contact area cues, thought to be key in encoding compliance. For both active and passive touch, we determine finger pad-to-stimulus contact areas, using an ink-based procedure, as well as discrimination thresholds. The findings indicate that in passive touch, participants cannot discriminate certain small compliant versus large stiff spheres, which generate similar contact areas. In active touch, however, participants easily discriminate these spheres, though contact areas remain similar. Supplementary cues based on stimulus rate and/or proprioception seem vital. One cue that does differ for illusion cases is finger displacement given a volitionally applied force.
在辨别柔顺或“柔软”物体的能力方面,我们依赖于从指尖接触中获取的信息。我们尚未解决最相关的感知线索。然而,这样做对于构建有效的动态显示器至关重要。通过各种大小和弹性的球体引入心理物理学错觉,我们研究了接触面积线索的效用,认为这是编码柔顺性的关键。对于主动触摸和被动触摸,我们使用基于墨水的程序确定指尖与刺激物的接触面积以及辨别阈值。研究结果表明,在被动触摸中,参与者无法区分某些产生相似接触面积的小的柔顺球体和大的坚硬球体。然而,在主动触摸中,尽管接触面积保持相似,参与者却很容易区分这些球体。基于刺激速率和/或本体感觉的补充线索似乎至关重要。对于错觉情况,一个确实不同的线索是在施加自愿力时手指的位移。