Zhong Rui, Chen Qingling, Zhang Xinyue, Li Mengmeng, Liang Jianmin, Lin Weihong
Department of Neurology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Department of Hepatology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Front Neurol. 2019 Nov 8;10:1171. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01171. eCollection 2019.
Data on changes in bone mineral density (BMD) from valproate (VPA) therapy are ambiguous and conflicting. Thus, the aim of this study was to systematically review the existing data and carry out a meta-analysis to investigate the effect of VPA as a monotherapy on BMD in people with epilepsy (PWE). We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE for eligible studies. We calculated the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) to investigate the statistical power of the association between VPA treatment and BMD. Nineteen studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. We found that BMD was lower in the VPA group than in the control group (SMD: -0.44; 95% CI: -0.65 to -0.22). A significant association was found in adult patients (SMD: -0.57; 95% CI: -0.88 to -0.26; = 69.8%) and pediatric patients (SMD: -0.32; 95% CI: -0.60 to -0.03; = 67.8%) by subgroup analysis. This study indicated that BMD was significantly lower in patients treated for more than 36 months than in controls (SMD: -0.52; 95% CI: -0.76 to -0.27; = 61.8%). However, a significant difference was not found between patients who were treated for less than 36 months and controls (SMD: -0.36; 95% CI: -0.72 to 0.01; = 74.8%). The present study provided evidence that VPA treatment was significantly associated with BMD loss in PWE. Thus, for patients at a high risk of osteoporosis and fracture, especially for patients who need long-term treatment, VPA may not be a good choice.
丙戊酸盐(VPA)治疗导致骨矿物质密度(BMD)变化的数据尚不明确且相互矛盾。因此,本研究的目的是系统回顾现有数据并进行荟萃分析,以调查VPA单药治疗对癫痫患者(PWE)骨密度的影响。我们系统检索了PubMed、EMBASE和MEDLINE以查找符合条件的研究。我们计算了标准化均数差(SMD)及95%置信区间(CI),以研究VPA治疗与骨密度之间关联的统计学效力。本系统回顾和荟萃分析纳入了19项研究。我们发现VPA组的骨密度低于对照组(SMD:-0.44;95%CI:-0.65至-0.22)。亚组分析在成年患者(SMD:-0.57;95%CI:-0.88至-0.26; = 69.8%)和儿科患者(SMD:-0.32;95%CI:-0.60至-0.03; = 67.8%)中发现了显著关联。本研究表明,治疗超过36个月的患者骨密度显著低于对照组(SMD:-0.52;95%CI:-0.76至-0.27; = 61.8%)。然而,治疗时间少于36个月的患者与对照组之间未发现显著差异(SMD:-0.36;95%CI:-0.72至0.01; = 74.8%)。本研究提供了证据表明VPA治疗与PWE的骨密度降低显著相关。因此,对于骨质疏松和骨折高风险患者,尤其是需要长期治疗的患者,VPA可能不是一个好的选择。