Agosti Edoardo, Saraceno Giorgio, Qiu Jimmy, Buffoli Barbara, Ferrari Marco, Raffetti Elena, Belotti Francesco, Ravanelli Marco, Mattavelli Davide, Schreiber Alberto, Hirtler Lena, Rodella Luigi F, Maroldi Roberto, Nicolai Piero, Gentili Fred, Kucharczyk Walter, Fontanella Marco M, Doglietto Francesco
Neurosurgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Largo Spedali Civili, 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
TECHNA Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Mar;162(3):649-660. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04152-4. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
The clivus was defined as "no man's land" in the early 1990s, but since then, multiple approaches have been described to access it. This study is aimed at quantitatively comparing endoscopic transnasal and microsurgical transcranial approaches to the clivus in a preclinical setting, using a recently developed research method.
Multiple approaches were performed in 5 head and neck specimens that underwent high-resolution computed tomography (CT): endoscopic transnasal (transclival, with hypophysiopexy and with far-medial extension), microsurgical anterolateral (supraorbital, mini-pterional, pterional, pterional transzygomatic, fronto-temporal-orbito-zygomatic), lateral (subtemporal and subtemporal transzygomatic), and posterolateral (retrosigmoid, far-lateral, retrolabyrinthine, translabyrinthine, and transcochlear). An optic neuronavigation system and dedicated software were used to quantify the working volume of each approach and calculate the exposure of different clival regions. Mixed linear models with random intersections were used for statistical analyses.
Endoscopic transnasal approaches showed higher working volume and larger exposure compared with microsurgical transcranial approaches. Increased exposure of the upper clivus was achieved by the transnasal endoscopic transclival approach with intradural hypophysiopexy. Anterolateral microsurgical transcranial approaches provided a direct route to the anterior surface of the posterior clinoid process. The transnasal endoscopic approach with far-medial extension ensured a statistically larger exposure of jugular tubercles as compared with other approaches. Presigmoid approaches provided a relatively limited exposure of the ipsilateral clivus, which increased in proportion to their invasiveness.
This is the first anatomical study that quantitatively compares in a holistic way exposure and working volumes offered by the most used modern approaches to the clivus.
斜坡在20世纪90年代初被定义为“无人区”,但自那时起,已描述了多种进入该区域的方法。本研究旨在使用一种最新开发的研究方法,在临床前环境中对内镜经鼻入路和显微外科经颅入路至斜坡进行定量比较。
对5例接受高分辨率计算机断层扫描(CT)的头颈部标本进行了多种入路操作:内镜经鼻入路(经斜坡、垂体固定和向内侧远外侧扩展)、显微外科前外侧入路(眶上入路、迷你翼点入路、翼点入路、翼点经颧弓入路、额颞眶颧入路)、外侧入路(颞下和颞下经颧弓入路)以及后外侧入路(乙状窦后入路、远外侧入路、迷路后入路、经迷路入路和经耳蜗入路)。使用光学神经导航系统和专用软件对每种入路的工作体积进行量化,并计算不同斜坡区域的暴露情况。采用具有随机交叉的混合线性模型进行统计分析。
与显微外科经颅入路相比,内镜经鼻入路显示出更高的工作体积和更大的暴露范围。经鼻内镜经斜坡入路联合硬膜内垂体固定可增加斜坡上部的暴露。显微外科前外侧经颅入路提供了一条通向床突后表面的直接路径。与其他入路相比,向内侧远外侧扩展的经鼻内镜入路在统计学上确保了对颈静脉结节更大的暴露。乙状窦前入路对同侧斜坡的暴露相对有限,其暴露程度与其侵袭性成正比增加。
这是第一项以整体方式定量比较最常用的现代斜坡入路所提供的暴露范围和工作体积的解剖学研究。