Área de Edafología y Química Agrícola, Facultad de Ciencias - IACYS, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.
Área de Producción Vegetal, Escuela de Ingenierías Agrarias - IACYS, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.
Pest Manag Sci. 2020 May;76(5):1795-1803. doi: 10.1002/ps.5705. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
Irrigation and tillage systems alone or in combination with organic amendments can strongly influence soil properties, which in turn may also modify the environmental fate of any pesticides applied. This study was aimed at determining how amendment with composted olive-mill waste (W) influenced leaching, sorption, and persistence of the herbicide clomazone in rice field soils under different tillage and irrigation management practices. The field trial conducted covered 3 years in succession, with six treatments: irrigation by sprinkler and conventional tillage without (ST) or with W application (80 Mg ha ) (STW), irrigation by sprinkler but no tillage (SNT), irrigation by sprinkler but no tillage with W application (SNTW), and continuous flooding irrigation and tillage without (FT) and with W application (FTW).
Application of W significantly increased the adsorption of clomazone to soil in the first and third years. In the first year, the persistence of clomazone under aerobic (t = 33.1-36.3 days) and anaerobic incubation conditions (t = 3.43-10.8 days) decreased after W application to t values in the ranges 18.1-29.7 and 3.06-5.44 days, respectively. However, in the third year, although clomazone persistence increased significantly in SNT and ST when W was applied under both incubation conditions, it decreased significantly in FT management under anaerobic incubation conditions. The addition of W led to less leaching of clomazone, particularly for the FT case where the herbicide leaching losses were 2.8 and 2.6 times lower in the first and third years after W addition, respectively.
Using W as an organic amendment could be regarded as an invaluable strategy to reduce water contamination by clomazone in rice production, especially under traditional tillage and flooding management. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
灌溉和耕作系统单独或与有机改良剂结合使用,可以强烈影响土壤特性,这反过来也可能改变任何施用的农药的环境归宿。本研究旨在确定在不同的耕作和灌溉管理实践下,用堆肥橄榄厂废物(W)改良如何影响除草剂氯唑草酮在稻田土壤中的淋溶、吸附和持久性。连续 3 年进行的田间试验共涉及 6 种处理:喷灌和常规耕作不施 W(ST)或施 W(80Mg/ha)(STW)、喷灌免耕(SNT)、喷灌免耕施 W(SNTW)和连续淹灌和耕作不施 W(FT)和施 W(FTW)。
W 的施用显著增加了氯唑草酮在第一年和第三年对土壤的吸附。在第一年,有氧(t=33.1-36.3天)和厌氧培养条件下(t=3.43-10.8天)氯唑草酮的持久性在 W 施用后分别降低到 18.1-29.7和 3.06-5.44天的范围内。然而,在第三年,尽管在有氧和厌氧培养条件下,SNT 和 ST 中 W 的施用均显著增加了氯唑草酮的持久性,但在 FT 管理下,厌氧培养条件下氯唑草酮的持久性显著降低。W 的添加导致氯唑草酮的淋溶减少,特别是在 FT 情况下,W 添加后第一年和第三年的除草剂淋溶损失分别降低了 2.8 和 2.6 倍。
将 W 用作有机改良剂可以被视为减少水稻生产中氯唑草酮对水的污染的一种宝贵策略,特别是在传统耕作和淹灌管理下。© 2019 化学工业协会。