Department of Occupational Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;45(3):341-348. doi: 10.3233/NRE-192805.
Reduced walking speed (WS) may lead to restrictions in participation of individuals with stroke, however, the relationships between WS and participation still need to better clarified.
To evaluate the relationships between WS and participation and compare the levels of participation of individuals with chronic stroke, who were stratified according to their walking status.
One-hundred and five individuals with stroke (58±12 years; 61 men) participated. WS was measured by the 10-meter walking test and reported in m/s. The participants were stratified into three walking status groups: household (WS <0.4 m/s), limited-community (0.4 m/s-0.8 m/s), and full-community ambulation (>0.8 m/s). Participation was assessed by the Brazilian version of the Assessment of Life Habits 3.1 (LIFE-H 3.1-Brazil).
Between-group analyses revealed statistically significant differences between the household, limited-community, and full-community ambulators regarding the LIFE-H 3.1 total (F = 17.5; p < 0.0001), as well the daily activity (F = 12.3; p < 0.0001) and social role (F = 19.0; p < 0.0001) domain scores. Measures of WS were correlated with the daily activity (r = 0.50, p < 0.0001), social role (r = 0.53, p < 0.0001), total LIFE-H scores (r = 0.53, p < 0.0001), and most of the LIFE-H categories (r = 0.23-0.56).
WS was significantly correlated with participation and was able to distinguish between individuals with stroke, who had different levels of participation.
步行速度降低(WS)可能会限制中风患者的参与度,但 WS 与参与度之间的关系仍需进一步阐明。
评估 WS 与参与度之间的关系,并比较根据步行状态分层的慢性中风患者的参与度水平。
105 名中风患者(58±12 岁;61 名男性)参与了研究。WS 通过 10 米步行测试测量,并以 m/s 报告。参与者被分为三组步行状态:居家(WS<0.4 m/s)、有限社区(0.4-0.8 m/s)和完全社区步行(>0.8 m/s)。参与度通过巴西版生活习惯评估 3.1 版(LIFE-H 3.1-Brazil)评估。
组间分析显示,在 LIFE-H 3.1 总分(F=17.5;p<0.0001)以及日常活动(F=12.3;p<0.0001)和社会角色(F=19.0;p<0.0001)领域得分方面,居家、有限社区和完全社区步行者之间存在统计学显著差异。WS 测量值与日常活动(r=0.50,p<0.0001)、社会角色(r=0.53,p<0.0001)、LIFE-H 总分(r=0.53,p<0.0001)以及大多数 LIFE-H 类别(r=0.23-0.56)呈显著相关。
WS 与参与度显著相关,能够区分中风患者不同的参与度水平。