Suppr超能文献

The treatment of gynaecological and intra-abdominal infections: a comparative study of cefotetan versus netilmicin plus clindamycin.

作者信息

Poularas J, Giamarellou H, Vlachos G, Theakou R, Patoulis J, Lekakos N, Stavridis J, Sfikakis P

机构信息

Athens University School of Medicine, 1st Dept. Propedeutic Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Greece.

出版信息

Chemioterapia. 1988 Aug;7(4):253-5.

PMID:3180305
Abstract

In a prospective randomised study 60 patients with gynaecological or intra-abdominal infections were given either 2g iv every 12 hours of cefotetan or a combination of netilmicin (150mg iv every 12 hours) and clindamycin (600mg iv every 8 hours). The clinical condition of nearly half the patients (26 of 60) was characterized as serious and surgical manipulation and drainage were performed in 57 of the 60 patients. The clinical response was similar in both groups with 21 of 29 patients in the cefotetan group and 29 of 33 patients in the netilmicin plus clindamycin group. Side effects were few and mild in nature with no significant differences between the two groups. This work is continuing but the results to date suggest that cefotetan monotherapy is a safe and effective alternative to a combination of netilmicin and clindamycin in the treatment of gynaecological and intra-abdominal infections.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验