Philips Health Systems, Philips India Ltd, Bangalore, India; Department of Physics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
Department of Physics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
Phys Med. 2020 Jan;69:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.11.020. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
We propose a novel method for the selection of optimal beam angles in Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT). The proposed approach uses an objective function based metric called "target-to-critical organ objective function ratio" to find out the optimal gantry angles. The beams are ranked based on this metric and are accordingly chosen for IMRT optimization. We have used the Pinnacle TPS (Philips Medical System V 16.2) for performing the IMRT optimization. In order to validate our approach, we have applied it in four clinical cases: Head and Neck, Lung, Abdomen and Prostate. Basically, for all clinical cases, two set of plans were created with same clinical objectives, namely Equal angle plan (EA Plan) and Suitable angle Plan (SA Plan). In the EA plans, the beam angles were placed in an equiangular manner starting from the gantry angle of 0°. In the corresponding SA plans, the beam angles were decided using the guidance provided by the algorithm. The reduction in OAR mean dose and max dose obtained in SA plans is about 3 to 16% and 3 to 15% respectively depending upon the treatment site while obtaining equal target coverage as compared to their EA counterparts. It takes approximately 15-25 min to find the optimal beam angles. The results obtained from the clinical cases indicate that the plan quality is considerably improved when the beam angles are optimized using the proposed method.
我们提出了一种在调强放射治疗(IMRT)中选择最佳射束角度的新方法。该方法使用一种名为“靶区-危及器官目标函数比”的基于目标函数的指标来找出最佳的旋转角度。根据该指标对射束进行排名,并相应地选择用于 IMRT 优化。我们使用 Pinnacle TPS(Philips Medical System V 16.2)进行 IMRT 优化。为了验证我们的方法,我们将其应用于四个临床病例:头颈部、肺部、腹部和前列腺。基本上,对于所有临床病例,我们使用相同的临床目标创建了两组计划:等角计划(EA 计划)和合适角计划(SA 计划)。在 EA 计划中,从旋转角度 0°开始以等角方式放置射束角度。在相应的 SA 计划中,使用算法提供的指导来决定射束角度。根据治疗部位的不同,SA 计划中 OAR 平均剂量和最大剂量的降低分别约为 3%至 16%和 3%至 15%,同时与 EA 计划相比,目标覆盖率相同。找到最佳射束角度大约需要 15-25 分钟。临床病例的结果表明,当使用建议的方法优化射束角度时,计划质量得到了显著提高。