Suppr超能文献

创伤性脑损伤后就业与物质滥用的相互关系:交叉滞后结构方程建模分析。

Interrelationships Between Post-TBI Employment and Substance Abuse: A Cross-lagged Structural Equation Modeling Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Institute of Statistical Research and Training, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 May;101(5):797-806. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.10.189. Epub 2019 Dec 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the interrelationship of postinjury employment and substance abuse (SA) among individuals with traumatic brain injury.

DESIGN

Structural equation model (SEM) and logistic regression analytic approach using a merged database of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) and Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems (TBIMS) National Database, with acute care and rehabilitation hospitalization data and 1, 2, and 5 year follow-up data.

SETTING

United States Level I/II trauma centers and inpatient rehabilitation centers with telephone follow-up.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals in the TBIMS National Database successfully matched to their NTDB data, aged 18-59 years, with trauma severity, age, sex, employment, and SA data at 1, 2, and/or 5 years postinjury (N=2890).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Employment status (employed/unemployed) and SA (present/absent) at year 1, year 2, and year 5 postinjury.

RESULTS

SEM analysis showed older age at injury predicted lower likelihood of employment at all time points postinjury (β=-0.016; β=-0.006; β=-0.016; all P<.001), while higher injury severity score (ISS) predicted lower likelihood of employment (β=-0.008; P=.027) and SA (β=-0.007; P=.050) at year 1. Male sex predicted higher likelihood of SA at each follow-up (β=0.227; β=0.184; β=0.161; all P<.100). Despite associations of preinjury unemployment with higher preinjury SA, postinjury employment at year 1 predicted SA at year 2 (β=0.118; P=.028). Employment and SA during the previous follow-up period predicted subsequent employment and SA, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Employment and SA have unique longitudinal interrelationships and are additionally influenced by age, sex, and ISS. The present work suggests the need for more research on causal, confounding, and mediating factors and appropriate screening and intervention tools that minimize SA and facilitate successful employment-related outcomes.

摘要

目的

描述创伤性脑损伤患者受伤后就业与物质滥用(SA)之间的相互关系。

设计

使用国家创伤数据库(NTDB)和创伤性脑损伤模型系统(TBIMS)国家数据库的合并数据库,采用结构方程模型(SEM)和逻辑回归分析方法,对急性护理和康复住院数据以及 1、2 和 5 年随访数据进行分析。

设置

美国一级/二级创伤中心和有电话随访的住院康复中心。

参与者

TBIMS 国家数据库中成功与 NTDB 数据匹配的年龄在 18-59 岁之间的个体,创伤严重程度、年龄、性别、就业和 SA 数据在 1、2 和/或 5 年受伤后(N=2890)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

受伤后 1 年、2 年和 5 年的就业状况(就业/失业)和 SA(存在/不存在)。

结果

SEM 分析显示,受伤时年龄较大预示着受伤后所有时间点的就业可能性较低(β=-0.016;β=-0.006;β=-0.016;均 P<.001),而较高的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)则预示着受伤后就业的可能性较低(β=-0.008;P=.027)和 SA(β=-0.007;P=.050)。男性性别预示着每个随访时 SA 的可能性更高(β=0.227;β=0.184;β=0.161;均 P<.100)。尽管受伤前失业与较高的受伤前 SA 有关,但受伤后 1 年的就业预测了 2 年的 SA(β=0.118;P=.028)。前一个随访期间的就业和 SA 分别预测了随后的就业和 SA。

结论

就业和 SA 具有独特的纵向相互关系,并且还受到年龄、性别和 ISS 的影响。目前的研究表明,需要更多的关于因果关系、混杂因素和中介因素的研究,以及适当的筛查和干预工具,以减少 SA 并促进成功的就业相关结果。

相似文献

1
Interrelationships Between Post-TBI Employment and Substance Abuse: A Cross-lagged Structural Equation Modeling Analysis.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 May;101(5):797-806. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.10.189. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
2
Acute Trauma Factor Associations With Suicidality Across the First 5 Years After Traumatic Brain Injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Aug;97(8):1301-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.017. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
5
Employment Stability in the First 5 Years After Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Mar;100(3):412-421. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.06.022. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
6
Acute predictors of return to employment after traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal follow-up.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 May;83(5):635-41. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.31605.
7
Depression as a Predictor of Long-term Employment Outcomes Among Individuals With Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Oct;100(10):1837-1843. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
9
Predictors of Employment Status in Male and Female Post-9/11 Veterans Evaluated for Traumatic Brain Injury.
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2019 Jan/Feb;34(1):11-20. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000404.
10
Employment outcome four years after a severe traumatic brain injury: results of the Paris severe traumatic brain injury study.
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Sep;40(18):2200-2207. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1327992. Epub 2017 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinct clinical phenotypes and their neuroanatomic correlates in chronic traumatic brain injury.
Brain Commun. 2025 Jun 6;7(3):fcaf216. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf216. eCollection 2025.
2
Distinct clinical phenotypes and their neuroanatomic correlates in chronic traumatic brain injury.
medRxiv. 2025 Jan 29:2025.01.27.25321200. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.27.25321200.
3
Interrelationships among workload, illness severity, and function on return to work following acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Aust Crit Care. 2023 Mar;36(2):247-253. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.01.002. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
4
Does Traumatic Brain Injury Cause Risky Substance Use or Substance Use Disorder?
Biol Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 1;91(5):421-437. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.07.013. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
5
The Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database: A Review of Published Research.
Neurotrauma Rep. 2021 Mar 12;2(1):149-164. doi: 10.1089/neur.2020.0047. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Traumatic Brain Injury and Psychiatric Co-Morbidity in the United States.
Psychiatr Q. 2019 Mar;90(1):151-158. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9617-0.
2
Employment Stability in the First 5 Years After Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Mar;100(3):412-421. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.06.022. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
4
Employment services and substance abuse treatment.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Apr;87:70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
5
Prediction of work resumption and sustainability up to 1 year after mild traumatic brain injury.
Neurology. 2017 Oct 31;89(18):1908-1914. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004604. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
6
Alcohol and Drug Use Before and During the First Year After Traumatic Brain Injury.
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018 May/Jun;33(3):E51-E60. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000341.
8
Injury severity measures for predicting return-to-work after a traumatic brain injury.
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jan;98:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.025. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
9
Measurement characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure.
Top Stroke Rehabil. 1994 Sep;1(3):1-15. doi: 10.1080/10749357.1994.11754030.
10
Chronic impact of traumatic brain injury on outcome and quality of life: a narrative review.
Crit Care. 2016 Jun 21;20(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1318-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验