Tong Y C, Lim H H, Clark G M
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Sep;84(3):876-87. doi: 10.1121/1.396657.
Speech perception studies were conducted on three cochlear implant patients to investigate the relative merits of six speech processing schemes for presenting speech information to these patients. Electrical stimuli, described in this article as synthetic vowels, were constructed using tabulated data of formant frequencies of natural vowels. The six schemes differed in the number of formant frequencies encoded on the electrical signal dimension of electrode position, and/or in the range of electrode position used for encoding each formant frequency. Eleven synthetic vowels (i, I, E, ae, a, c, U, u, v, E, D) were used and were presented in a single-interval procedure for absolute identification. Single-formant vowels were used in two of the six schemes, two-formant vowels in three schemes, and three-formant vowels in the remaining scheme. The confusion matrices were subjected to conditional information transmission analysis on the basis of previous psychophysiological findings. Comparisons among the schemes in terms of the analyzed results showed that training, experience, and adaptability to new speech processing schemes were major factors influencing the identification of synthetic vowels. For vowels containing more than one formant, the information about each formant affected the perception of the other formants. In addition, there appeared to be differences between the perceptual processes for vowels containing more than one formant and the processes for single-formant vowels. Taking into consideration the effects of training, experience, and adaptability, the three-formant speech processing scheme appeared, on the basis of perceptual performance comparisons among the six schemes, to be the logical choice for implementation in speech processors for cochlear implant patients.