Imperfect but important: a fellow's perspective on journal peer review.
作者信息
Neumann Natalie
机构信息
Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Safety, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, USA.
出版信息
J Med Toxicol. 2020 Jan;16(1):1-2. doi: 10.1007/s13181-019-00751-w. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Imperfect but important: a fellow's perspective on journal peer review.
J Med Toxicol. 2020 Jan;16(1):1-2. doi: 10.1007/s13181-019-00751-w. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
2
Update on the Manuscript Peer Review Process.
Toxicol Pathol. 2017 Dec;45(8):1028-1031. doi: 10.1177/0192623317742616. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
3
The Role of Pediatrics in Medical Toxicology: a Fellow's Perspective.
J Med Toxicol. 2021 Oct;17(4):327-329. doi: 10.1007/s13181-021-00852-5. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
4
Fortifying the external peer review: an editorial perspective.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015 Jan;25(1):2-3.
5
How to review a paper: suggestions from the editors of Surgery and the Journal of Surgical Research.
J Surg Res. 2017 Jul;215:264-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 4.
6
State of the journal 2017.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018 Mar;29(3):363-364. doi: 10.1111/jce.13478.
7
Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 24;9(11):e033421. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033421.
8
What happens to your submission at Australasian Journal on Ageing?
Australas J Ageing. 2017 Jun;36(2):87-88. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12431.
9
The Currency of Science.
Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2017 Oct;15(8):385-386. doi: 10.1089/met.2017.0130. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
10
A vision for the European journal of clinical investigation: note from the new editors.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2010 Jan;40(1):1-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02229.x.
引用本文的文献
1
Enhancing scholarly discourse in the age of artificial intelligence: A guided approach to effective peer review process.
Tunis Med. 2023 Oct 5;101(10):721-726.
2
Scientists' perception of pilot study quality was influenced by statistical significance and study design.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Jul;159:70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.05.011. Epub 2023 May 20.
3
Fostering the Next Generation of Researchers: a Sustainable Mentoring Program for Early Career Toxicologists in Scientific Abstract Review.
J Med Toxicol. 2023 Apr;19(2):224-227. doi: 10.1007/s13181-023-00938-2. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
本文引用的文献
1
Maintaining the Public Trust in Journals with Ethical Publishing.
J Med Toxicol. 2017 Dec;13(4):275-277. doi: 10.1007/s13181-017-0635-3. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
2
Making the First Cut: An Analysis of Academic Medicine Editors' Reasons for Not Sending Manuscripts Out for External Peer Review.
Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3):464-470. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001860.
3
Just Because It's Published Doesn't Mean It's Perfect: The Continuing Evolution of the Peer Review Process.
Ophthalmology. 2015 Oct;122(10):1958-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.006.
4
Becoming a peer reviewer to medical education journals.
Med Teach. 2012;34(9):698-704. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.687488. Epub 2012 May 30.
5
Any jackass can trash a manuscript, but it takes good scholarship to create one (how MBoC promotes civil and constructive peer review).
Mol Biol Cell. 2011 Mar 1;22(5):525-7. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-01-0002.
6
A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Oct;185(4):848-54. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0782.
7
Guarding the guardians: a conference on editorial peer review.
JAMA. 1986 Nov 7;256(17):2391-2.
Zotero 插件