Suppr超能文献

应对中国的疫苗犹豫问题:对中国学术研究的范围综述

Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy in China: A Scoping Review of Chinese Scholarship.

作者信息

Yang Ronghui, Penders Bart, Horstman Klasien

机构信息

Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Vaccines (Basel). 2019 Dec 20;8(1):2. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8010002.

Abstract

Despite the well-developed Chinese National Immunization Program, vaccine hesitancy in China is rising. As part of the response, Chinese scholars have studied determinants and proposed solutions to vaccination hesitancy. We performed a scoping review of Chinese literature (2007-2019), drawn from four Chinese databases. We mapped relevant information and presented a systemic account of the proposed determinants and responses to vaccine hesitancy in China. We identified 77 relevant studies that reveal four approaches to vaccine hesitancy. Most Chinese studies define vaccine hesitancy as a problem of vaccine safety and vaccine incident response and place accountability on the level of governance, such as regulation deficits and inappropriate crisis management. A first minority of studies tied vaccination hesitancy to unprofessional medical conduct and called for additional resources and enhanced physician qualifications. A second minority of studies positioned vaccination hesitancy as a problem of parental belief and pointed to the role of media, proposing enhanced communication and education. Chinese literature ties vaccine hesitancy primarily to vaccine safety and medical conduct. Compared to international research, parental concerns are underrepresented. The Chinese context of vaccination scandals notably frames the discussion of vaccination hesitancy and potential solutions, which stresses the importance of considering vaccination hesitancy in specific social and political contexts.

摘要

尽管中国国家免疫规划已发展完善,但中国的疫苗犹豫现象却在增加。作为应对措施的一部分,中国学者研究了疫苗犹豫的决定因素并提出了解决方案。我们对来自四个中文数据库的中国文献(2007 - 2019年)进行了范围综述。我们梳理了相关信息,并对中国提出的疫苗犹豫的决定因素及应对措施进行了系统阐述。我们识别出77项相关研究,这些研究揭示了应对疫苗犹豫的四种方法。大多数中国研究将疫苗犹豫定义为疫苗安全和疫苗事件应对问题,并将责任归咎于治理层面,如监管不足和危机管理不当。一小部分研究将疫苗犹豫与不专业的医疗行为联系起来,并呼吁增加资源和提高医生资质。另一小部分研究将疫苗犹豫定位为家长观念问题,并指出媒体的作用,提议加强沟通和教育。中国文献主要将疫苗犹豫与疫苗安全和医疗行为联系起来。与国际研究相比,家长的担忧未得到充分体现。中国疫苗丑闻的背景显著影响了对疫苗犹豫及潜在解决方案的讨论,这强调了在特定社会和政治背景下考虑疫苗犹豫问题的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32cb/7157208/92603b853f61/vaccines-08-00002-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验