Graduate School of Education, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2020 Dec;90(4):964-980. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12338. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
Academic buoyancy (Martin & Marsh, 2006, Oxford Review of Education, 35, 353; 2008, Journal of School Psychology, 46, 53) is students' competence to respond effectively to academic daily setbacks and is considered an optimal characteristic of students' functioning related to achievement. From the self-determination theory perspective (Ryan & Deci, 2017, American Psychologist, 55, 68), satisfaction of the need for autonomy, competence, and relatedness and autonomous forms of motivation relate to students' optimal functioning in schooling.
We investigated (1) whether students' end-of-course (T2) academic buoyancy in the normative environment of English preparatory programmes (EPP) is predicted by their beginning-of-course (T1) need satisfaction or frustration and autonomous or controlled motivation (i.e., high or low self-determined motivation), and (2) whether students' T2 academic buoyancy mediates the relation between students' T1 self-determined motivation and final (T3) academic achievement.
In T1 and T2, 267 students (M = 19.11, SD = 1.28) attending three EPPs in Ankara, Turkey, participated in the study.
A prospective design was used, data were collected through self-reports, and SEM was conducted to test the hypotheses.
Students' T1 need frustration negatively predicted T1 autonomous motivation and positively predicted T1 controlled motivation, which (respectively) positively and negatively predicted T2 academic buoyancy. T1 need satisfaction related positively to T2 academic buoyancy. Finally, T2 academic buoyancy mediated the relation between students' need satisfaction and final achievement while controlled motivation was also negatively related to final achievement.
Students' high need satisfaction and low need frustration as well as high autonomous and low controlled motivation could support students' buoyancy and achievement in the normative settings of EPP.
学术弹性(Martin & Marsh,2006,《牛津教育评论》,35,353;2008,《学校心理学杂志》,46,53)是学生有效应对学术日常挫折的能力,被认为是与成就相关的学生最佳功能特征。从自我决定理论的角度(Ryan & Deci,2017,《美国心理学家》,55,68),满足自主、能力和相关需求以及自主形式的动机与学生在学校教育中的最佳功能有关。
我们调查了(1)在英语预备课程(EPP)的规范环境中,学生在课程结束时(T2)的学术弹性是否可以由他们在课程开始时(T1)的需求满足或挫折以及自主或控制动机(即高或低自我决定动机)来预测,以及(2)学生的 T2 学术弹性是否在学生的 T1 自我决定动机与最终(T3)学术成绩之间的关系中起中介作用。
在 T1 和 T2 中,来自土耳其安卡拉的三所 EPP 的 267 名学生(M=19.11,SD=1.28)参与了这项研究。
采用前瞻性设计,通过自我报告收集数据,并进行结构方程模型检验假设。
学生的 T1 需求挫折负向预测 T1 自主动机,正向预测 T1 控制动机,(分别)正向和负向预测 T2 学术弹性。T1 需求满足与 T2 学术弹性呈正相关。最后,T2 学术弹性中介了学生需求满足与最终成绩之间的关系,而控制动机也与最终成绩呈负相关。
学生的高需求满足和低需求挫折以及高自主和低控制动机可以支持学生在 EPP 的规范环境中保持弹性和取得成绩。