Division of Pediatric Urology, Seattle Children's Hospital, and Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Division of Pediatric Urology, Children's Hospital and Medical Center, and Department of Surgery (Urologic Surgery), University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2020 Dec 31;9(6):680-685. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piz095.
Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common, but data related to these infections maybe difficult to capture. We developed an electronic surveillance algorithm to identify patients with SSIs. Our objective was to validate our algorithm by comparing it with our institutional National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric (NSQIP Peds) data.
We applied our algorithm to our institutional NSQIP Peds 2015-2017 cohort. The algorithm consisted of the presence of a diagnosis code for post-operative infection or the presence of 4 criteria: diagnosis code for infection, antibiotic administration, positive culture, and readmission/surgery related to infection. We compared the algorithm's SSI rate to the NSQIP Peds identified SSI. Algorithm performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and Cohen's kappa. The charts of discordant patients were reviewed to understand limitations of the algorithm.
Of 3879 patients included, 2.5% had SSIs by NSQIP Peds definition and 1.9% had SSIs by our algorithm. Our algorithm achieved a sensitivity of 44%, specificity of 99%, NPV of 99%, PPV of 59%, and Cohen's kappa of 0.5. Of the 54 false negatives, 37% were diagnosed/treated as outpatients, 31% had tracheitis, and 17% developed SSIs during their post-operative admission. Of the 30 false positives, 33% had an infection at index surgery and 33% had SSIs related to other surgeries/procedures.
Our algorithm achieved high specificity and NPV compared with NSQIP Peds reported SSIs and may be useful when identifying SSIs in patient populations that are not actively monitored for SSIs.
手术部位感染(SSI)很常见,但与这些感染相关的数据可能难以捕捉。我们开发了一种电子监测算法来识别 SSI 患者。我们的目标是通过将我们的算法与我们机构的国家外科质量改进计划儿科(NSQIP Peds)数据进行比较来验证我们的算法。
我们将我们的算法应用于我们机构的 NSQIP Peds 2015-2017 队列。该算法包括术后感染诊断代码的存在或存在 4 项标准:感染诊断代码、抗生素使用、阳性培养和与感染相关的再入院/手术。我们比较了算法的 SSI 发生率与 NSQIP Peds 确定的 SSI。使用灵敏度、特异性、阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性预测值(PPV)和 Cohen's kappa 评估算法的性能。对不一致患者的图表进行了审查,以了解算法的局限性。
在 3879 名患者中,根据 NSQIP Peds 的定义,有 2.5%的患者发生 SSI,根据我们的算法,有 1.9%的患者发生 SSI。我们的算法灵敏度为 44%,特异性为 99%,NPV 为 99%,PPV 为 59%,Cohen's kappa 为 0.5。在 54 例假阴性中,37%的患者在门诊被诊断/治疗,31%的患者患有气管炎,17%的患者在术后住院期间发生 SSI。在 30 例假阳性中,33%的患者在指数手术时存在感染,33%的患者存在与其他手术/程序相关的 SSI。
与 NSQIP Peds 报告的 SSI 相比,我们的算法具有较高的特异性和 NPV,在对未积极监测 SSI 的患者人群进行 SSI 识别时可能有用。