Al-Samkari Hanny, Rosovsky Rachel P, Karp Leaf Rebecca S, Smith David B, Goodarzi Katayoon, Fogerty Annemarie E, Sykes David B, Kuter David J
Division of Hematology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Blood Adv. 2020 Jan 14;4(1):9-18. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000868.
Platelet autoantibody (PA) testing has previously shown poor sensitivity for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) diagnosis, but no previous study used both 2011 American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines for ITP diagnosis and 2012 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) PA testing recommendations. We therefore performed a comprehensive retrospective study of PA testing in adult patients with ITP strictly applying these criteria. Of 986 PA assays performed, 485 assays in 368 patients met criteria and were included. Sensitivity and specificity of a positive test result for diagnosis of active ITP (n = 228 patients) were 90% and 78%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of a negative test result for clinical remission (n = 61 assays) were 87% and 91%. Antibodies against both glycoprotein IIb (GPIIb)/IIIa and GPIb/IX were required for the presence of antibodies against GPIa/IIa in patients with ITP. Logistic regression analysis revealed that more positive autoantibodies predicted more severe disease (relative to nonsevere ITP, relative risk ratio for severe ITP and refractory ITP was 2.27 [P < .001] and 3.09 [P < .001], respectively, per additional autoantibody); however, serologic testing did not meaningfully predict treatment response to glucocorticoids, intravenous immunoglobulin, or thrombopoietin receptor agonists. Sixty-four patients with ITP had multiple PA assays performed longitudinally: all 10 patients achieving remission converted from positive to negative serologic results, and evidence for epitope spreading was observed in 35% of patients with ongoing active disease. In conclusion, glycoprotein-specific direct PA testing performed using ISTH recommendations in patients meeting ASH diagnostic criteria is sensitive and specific for ITP diagnosis and reliably confirms clinical remission. More glycoproteins targeted by autoantibodies predicts for more severe disease.
血小板自身抗体(PA)检测先前已显示出对免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)诊断的敏感性较差,但此前尚无研究同时采用2011年美国血液学会(ASH)的ITP诊断指南和2012年国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)的PA检测建议。因此,我们对成年ITP患者的PA检测进行了一项全面的回顾性研究,严格应用这些标准。在进行的986次PA检测中,368例患者的485次检测符合标准并被纳入研究。对于活动性ITP诊断(n = 228例患者),阳性检测结果的敏感性和特异性分别为90%和78%。对于临床缓解(n = 61次检测),阴性检测结果的敏感性和特异性分别为87%和91%。ITP患者中,若存在针对糖蛋白Ia/IIa的抗体,则需要同时存在针对糖蛋白IIb(GPIIb)/IIIa和GPIb/IX的抗体。逻辑回归分析显示,更多的自身抗体阳性预示着疾病更严重(相对于非严重ITP,每增加一种自身抗体,严重ITP和难治性ITP的相对风险比分别为2.27 [P < .001]和3.09 [P < .001]);然而,血清学检测并不能有效预测对糖皮质激素、静脉注射免疫球蛋白或血小板生成素受体激动剂的治疗反应。64例ITP患者进行了多次纵向PA检测:所有10例实现缓解的患者血清学结果从阳性转为阴性,并且在35%仍处于活动性疾病的患者中观察到表位扩展的证据。总之,在符合ASH诊断标准的患者中,按照ISTH建议进行的糖蛋白特异性直接PA检测对ITP诊断具有敏感性和特异性,并能可靠地确认临床缓解。自身抗体靶向的糖蛋白越多,预示疾病越严重。