Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto-Faculty of Medicine, Porto, Portugal
Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Unit, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Sao Joao EPE, Porto, Portugal.
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 30;9(12):e033486. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033486.
To assess validity of record linkage using multiple indirect personal identifiers to identify same-patient hospitalisations and definition of episode of care (EC) due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
Using national hospital discharge data to identify all admissions due to ACS, we used six different linkage rules using indirect identifiers with increasing level of detail and compared validity against a pseudonymised unique identifier used as gold standard (GS). Contiguous hospitalisations within each matched group of hospitalizations occurring within 28 days of each other were considered one EC. We classified hospitalisations according to time between the first pair of hospitalisations as hospital transfer (HT: ≤1 day), early readmission (ER: 2-28 days) or recurrent cases (>28 days).
There were 146 671 hospitalisations (unlinked), 121 987 ACS 28-day EC (linked GS), with 18 398 HTs (≤1 day), and 6286 ERs (≤28 days). Linkage rules using demographic and residence code variables produced linkage rates with highest validity for rule using sex, date of birth and four-digit residence code with sensitivity of 98.4 (95% CI: 98.4 to 98.5); specificity of 97.8 (95% CI: 97.6 to 98.0) and Cohen's κ of 0.9 to detect ACS-EC, compared with GS linkage rule. Similarly, validity for HT and ER was high and of similar magnitude, with sensitivity ranging between 97.2% and 98.1%, and specificity between 98.8% and 99.9%, respectively.
Our internal linkage validation study using indirect patient identifiers will allow calibration of incidence rates and performance indicators, accounting for the effect of HT and readmissions.
评估使用多个间接个人标识符来识别同一患者的住院情况和急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)相关的医疗照护时段(EC)的定义的有效性。
利用国家住院数据来识别所有 ACS 住院患者,我们使用了六种不同的链接规则,这些规则使用了具有不同详细程度的间接标识符,并将其与用作金标准(GS)的匿名唯一标识符的有效性进行了比较。在每个匹配的住院组中,在彼此 28 天内发生的连续住院被视为一个 EC。我们根据两次住院之间的时间将住院情况分为医院转院(HT:≤1 天)、早期再入院(ER:2-28 天)或复发性病例(>28 天)。
共有 146671 次住院(未链接),121987 次 ACS 28 天 EC(链接 GS),其中 18398 次 HT(≤1 天)和 6286 次 ER(≤28 天)。使用人口统计学和居住代码变量的链接规则产生了最高有效性的链接率,其中使用性别、出生日期和四位数字居住代码的规则具有最高的敏感性(98.4%[95%置信区间:98.4%至 98.5%])、特异性(97.8%[95%置信区间:97.6%至 98.0%])和 Cohen's κ 为 0.9,用于检测 ACS-EC,与 GS 链接规则相比。同样,HT 和 ER 的有效性也很高,并且具有相似的幅度,敏感性范围在 97.2%至 98.1%之间,特异性范围在 98.8%至 99.9%之间。
我们使用间接患者标识符进行的内部链接验证研究将允许对发病率和绩效指标进行校准,以考虑到 HT 和再入院的影响。