Richard Lauralie, Richardson Georgia, Jaye Chrystal, Stokes Tim
General Practice & Rural Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
General Practice & Rural Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 31;9(12):e034323. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034323.
To explore the perspectives of primary healthcare (PHC) professionals providing care to refugees through mainstream general practice.
Qualitative exploratory design with semistructured interviews subjected to inductive thematic analysis.
Nine general practices enrolled in the Dunedin Refugee Resettlement Programme, in New Zealand (NZ)'s southern health region. Participants included nine general practitioners and six practice nurses.
Three analytical constructs were identified: relational engagement with refugees, refugee healthcare delivery and providers' professional role shaped by complexity. Building meaningful relational connections involved acknowledging refugees' journeys by getting to know them as people. This was instrumental for the development of an empathetic understanding of the complex human trajectories that characterise refugees' journeys to NZ. Participants encountered challenges in providing care to refugees with respect to time-limited consultations, variable use of interpreter services, fragmentation of care between agencies and need for improved health infrastructure to ensure a fluid interface between PHC, secondary care and community support services. The current business model of NZ general practice was perceived to interfere with value-driven care and discouraged tailoring of care to specific patient groups, raising concerns about the 'fit' of mainstream general practice to address the complex healthcare needs of refugees. Meeting the needs of refugees across the social determinants of health involved a lot of 'behind the scenes work' particularly in the absence of shared information systems and the lack of well-established referral pathways to connect refugees to services beyond the health sector. This led to providers feeling overwhelmed and uncertain about their ability to provide appropriate care to refugees.
This study provides rich context-specific findings that enhance PHC responsiveness to the needs of refugees in NZ.
探讨通过主流全科医疗为难民提供护理的初级医疗保健(PHC)专业人员的观点。
采用定性探索性设计,进行半结构化访谈并进行归纳主题分析。
新西兰(NZ)南部健康地区参与达尼丁难民重新安置计划的9家全科诊所。参与者包括9名全科医生和6名执业护士。
确定了三个分析框架:与难民的关系互动、为难民提供医疗保健以及由复杂性塑造的提供者专业角色。建立有意义的关系连接包括通过了解难民本人来承认他们的经历。这有助于对难民前往新西兰途中复杂的人生轨迹产生同理心理解。参与者在为难民提供护理方面面临挑战,包括咨询时间有限、口译服务使用情况不一、各机构之间护理碎片化以及需要改善卫生基础设施以确保初级医疗保健、二级护理和社区支持服务之间的顺畅衔接。新西兰全科医疗的当前商业模式被认为干扰了以价值为导向的护理,不利于针对特定患者群体量身定制护理,引发了对主流全科医疗是否适合满足难民复杂医疗需求的担忧。满足难民在健康社会决定因素方面的需求涉及大量“幕后工作),尤其是在缺乏共享信息系统以及缺乏完善的转诊途径将难民与卫生部门以外的服务联系起来的情况下。这导致提供者感到不堪重负,对自己为难民提供适当护理的能力感到不确定。
本研究提供了丰富的针对具体背景的研究结果,增强了初级医疗保健对新西兰难民需求的响应能力。