Department of Conservative Dentistry - Section for Translational Health Economics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Dentistry - Quality and Safety of Oral Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Philips van Leydenlaan 25, 6525 EX, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Apr;21(3):425-436. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01145-z. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
In 2012, The Netherlands established the so-called "free market experiment", which allowed providers of dental care to set the prices for their dental services themselves. The introduction of market mechanisms is intended to improve the quality of care and to contribute to cost containment, but increasing health expenditures for citizens have been observed in this context. Using large-volume health insurance claims data and exploiting the 2012 experiment in Dutch dental care, we identified the effects of a liberalization of service prices. Using pooled regression with individual fixed effects, we analyzed changes in utilization patterns of prevention-oriented dental services in response to the experiment as well as the elasticities in demand in response to variations in out-of-pocket (OOP) prices. We found substantial increases in prices and patients' OOP contributions for dental services following the liberalization with differences in increases between types of services. In response to the experiment, the proportion of treatment sessions containing preventive-oriented services decreased significantly by 3.4% among adults and by 5.3% for children and adolescents. Estimates of short-run price elasticities of demand for different services point towards differences in price sensitivity. One potential explanation for the observed variations in prices and utilization could be different extents of asymmetric information for first-stage and follow-on services. Price liberalization seems to have affected the composition of treatment sessions towards a decreasing use of preventive services, suggesting a shift in the reason for seeing a dental care provider from a regular-preventive perspective to a symptom-based restorative approach.
2012 年,荷兰开展了所谓的“自由市场实验”,允许牙科服务提供商自行制定其牙科服务价格。引入市场机制旨在提高医疗质量并有助于控制成本,但在这种情况下,公民的医疗支出却在增加。利用大量医疗保险理赔数据并利用荷兰牙科护理 2012 年的实验,我们确定了服务价格自由化的影响。我们使用个体固定效应的汇总回归分析了针对该实验的预防导向牙科服务利用模式的变化以及自付价格变化的需求弹性。我们发现,自自由化以来,牙科服务的价格和患者自付额大幅上涨,不同服务类型的涨幅存在差异。作为实验的回应,含有预防导向服务的治疗次数在成年人中显著减少了 3.4%,在儿童和青少年中减少了 5.3%。不同服务的短期需求价格弹性估计表明价格敏感度存在差异。观察到的价格和利用变化的一个潜在解释可能是第一阶段和后续服务的信息不对称程度不同。价格自由化似乎已经影响了治疗方案的构成,减少了预防服务的使用,这表明从定期预防的角度转变为基于症状的修复方法来看待牙科护理提供者的理由。