• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反思性实践与健康科学馆员:参与、收益与障碍。

Reflective practice and health sciences librarians: engagement, benefits, and barriers.

机构信息

Director, Mulford Health Science Library, and Assistant Professor, Library Administration, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH,

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Jan;108(1):17-28. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2020.777. Epub 2020 Jan 1.

DOI:10.5195/jmla.2020.777
PMID:31897048
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6919986/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Reflective practice is common in nursing and other professions. In the published literature, there is very little about librarians' use of reflective practice and no studies of health librarians' use of reflective practice. This study examined the use of reflective practice among health sciences librarians, perceived benefits, and perceived barriers to use.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study replicated the 2014 study by Greenall and Sen, using a version of their questionnaire. The research population in this study was health sciences librarians who were members of the MEDLIB-L email discussion list, Medical Library Association (MLA) chapter email discussion lists, and/or MLA section email discussion lists.

RESULTS

There were 106 librarians who completed the questionnaire, ranging from those new to the profession through midcareer to longtime librarians. While a high percentage of respondents considered themselves to be reflective practitioners (77%), a larger percentage (87%) reported that they consciously spent time reflecting. Respondents selected a wide variety of benefits of reflective practice, while barriers tended to center on lack of time, knowledge, skills, or experience.

CONCLUSION

The diversity of benefits that respondents selected suggests that reflective practice can play an important positive role in librarians' professional development. Reported barriers to reflective practice suggest that there is a need for educational opportunities to develop skills.

摘要

目的

反思实践在护理和其他专业中很常见。在已发表的文献中,关于图书馆员使用反思实践的内容很少,也没有关于卫生图书馆员使用反思实践的研究。本研究调查了卫生科学图书馆员使用反思实践的情况、他们认为的益处,以及使用反思实践的障碍。

方法

本横断面研究复制了 Greenall 和 Sen 在 2014 年的研究,使用了他们问卷的一个版本。本研究的研究对象是医学图书馆协会(MLA)电子邮件讨论列表、MLA 分会电子邮件讨论列表和/或 MLA 部门电子邮件讨论列表的成员,这些成员是健康科学图书馆员。

结果

共有 106 名图书馆员完成了问卷,他们的职业经验从新手到中期到资深不等。虽然很大比例的受访者认为自己是反思实践者(77%),但更大比例(87%)的人报告说他们有意识地花时间反思。受访者选择了广泛的反思实践的益处,而障碍往往集中在缺乏时间、知识、技能或经验上。

结论

受访者选择的多样性益处表明,反思实践可以在图书馆员的专业发展中发挥重要的积极作用。报告的反思实践障碍表明,需要有机会发展技能的教育机会。