Resection Plus Post-operative Adjuvant Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) Compared with Resection Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE

Multiple studies have demonstrated adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (aTACE) after resection improved outcomes compared to resection alone for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Unlike pre-operative TACE which targets a lesion, aTACE is administered in the proximal hepatic artery to destroy cancer cells within the remaining liver. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to quantify this survival and disease-free survival (DFS) benefit.

METHODS

A search of five databases was performed from inception to 20 August 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies (six randomized controlled trials) involving 7817 patients were included. Patients treated with resection plus aTACE had significantly better 1-year survival (OR, 2.53 [95% CI, 1.70-3.76, p < 0.001) and 1-year DFS (OR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.60-2.28, p < 0.001) compared to resection alone. The survival benefit remained significant for 2- to 5-year survival (OR 2.39, 1.83, 2.12, 1.87, respectively) and 2- to 4-year DFS (OR 1.85, 1.24, 1.67, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed significant survival benefit with aTACE in microvascular invasion (MVI)-positive HCC, portal venous tumour thrombus (PVTT) that does not involve the main trunk, PVTT-negative, satellite nodules, with and without resection margin < 1 cm. No mortalities were reported with aTACE.

CONCLUSION

Post-operative aTACE is safe and improves overall and disease-free survival, with the greatest benefit in MVI-positive patients. The current evidence weakly supports the use of adjuvant TACE for patients without PVTT, with PVTT that does not involve the main trunk, with and without a resection margin < 1 cm, and patients with satellite nodules.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1.