Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Magill Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jan;75 Suppl 1:e18-e27. doi: 10.1111/anae.14921.
Article 25 of the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights enshrines the right to health and well-being for every individual. However, universal access to high-quality healthcare remains the purview of a handful of wealthy nations. This is no more apparent than in peri-operative care, where an estimated five billion individuals lack access to safe, affordable and timely surgical care. Delivery of surgery and anaesthesia in low-resource environments presents unique challenges that, when unaddressed, result in limited access to low-quality care. Current peri-operative research and clinical guidance often fail to acknowledge these system-level deficits and therefore have limited applicability in low-resource settings. In this manuscript, the authors priority-set the need for equitable access to high-quality peri-operative care and analyse the system-level contributors to excess peri-operative mortality rates, a key marker of quality of care. To provide examples of how research and investment may close the equity gap, a modified Delphi method was adopted to curate and appraise interventions which may, with subsequent research and evaluation, begin to address the barriers to high-quality peri-operative care in low- and middle-income countries.
《联合国世界人权宣言》第二十五条规定了每个人享有健康和福祉的权利。然而,享有高质量医疗保健的普遍性仍然是少数富裕国家的特权。在围手术期护理方面,这一点表现得尤为明显,据估计,有 50 亿人无法获得安全、负担得起和及时的手术护理。在资源匮乏的环境中提供手术和麻醉服务带来了独特的挑战,如果这些挑战得不到解决,将导致获得低质量护理的机会有限。当前的围手术期研究和临床指南往往没有认识到这些系统层面的缺陷,因此在资源匮乏的环境中应用有限。在本文中,作者确定了公平获得高质量围手术期护理的必要性,并分析了导致围手术期死亡率过高的系统层面因素,这是护理质量的一个关键指标。为了提供研究和投资如何缩小公平差距的例子,采用了改良 Delphi 方法来策划和评估干预措施,这些干预措施可能随着后续的研究和评估,开始解决中低收入国家高质量围手术期护理的障碍。