• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外周置入中心静脉导管会导致儿童发生静脉血栓栓塞的风险增加。

Peripherally inserted central catheters lead to a high risk of venous thromboembolism in children.

机构信息

Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

Blood. 2020 Jan 16;135(3):220-226. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019002260.

DOI:10.1182/blood.2019002260
PMID:31909784
Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence in children has sharply increased with the majority of cases secondary to central venous catheters (CVCs). Among CVCs, the number of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) placed has risen significantly. In this multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study, we enrolled patients aged 6 months to 18 years with newly placed PICCs or tunneled lines (TLs). We evaluated the incidence of VTE, central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), and catheter malfunctions in PICCs and TLs, and risk factors of CVC-related VTE. A total of 1967 CVCs were included in the analysis. The incidence of CVC-related VTE was 5.9% ± 0.63%. The majority of the cases, 80%, were in subjects with PICCs, which had a significantly higher risk of catheter-related VTE than subjects with TLs (hazard ratio [HR] = 8.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1-23; P < .001). PICCs were significantly more likely to have a CLABSI (HR = 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.2; P = .002) and CVC malfunction (HR = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.6-2.4; P < .001). Increased risk of CVC-related VTE was found in patients with a prior history of VTE (HR = 23; 95% CI, 4-127; P < .001), multilumen CVC (HR = 3.9; 95% CI, 1.8-8.9; P = .003), and leukemia (HR = 3.5; 95% CI, 1.3-9.0; P = .031). Children with PICCs had a significantly higher incidence of catheter-related VTE, CLABSI, and CVC malfunction over TLs. The results suggest that pause be taken prior to placing CVCs, especially PICCs, due to the serious complications they have been shown to cause.

摘要

静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)在儿童中的发病率急剧上升,大多数病例继发于中心静脉导管(CVC)。在 CVC 中,外周静脉置入中心静脉导管(PICC)的数量显著增加。在这项多中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究中,我们纳入了年龄在 6 个月至 18 岁之间、新置入 PICC 或隧道式导管(TL)的患者。我们评估了 PICC 和 TL 中 VTE、导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)和导管故障的发生率,以及 CVC 相关 VTE 的危险因素。共纳入 1967 例 CVC。CVC 相关 VTE 的发生率为 5.9%±0.63%。大多数病例(80%)发生在 PICC 患者中,与 TL 患者相比,PICC 患者的导管相关 VTE 风险明显更高(风险比[HR] = 8.5;95%置信区间[CI],3.1-23;P<0.001)。PICC 更有可能发生 CLABSI(HR = 1.6;95%CI,1.2-2.2;P=0.002)和 CVC 故障(HR = 2.0;95%CI,1.6-2.4;P<0.001)。有 VTE 病史(HR = 23;95%CI,4-127;P<0.001)、多腔 CVC(HR = 3.9;95%CI,1.8-8.9;P=0.003)和白血病(HR = 3.5;95%CI,1.3-9.0;P=0.031)的患者 CVC 相关 VTE 的风险增加。与 TL 相比,PICC 患儿的导管相关性 VTE、CLABSI 和 CVC 故障发生率明显更高。结果表明,由于 PICC 等 CVC 会导致严重并发症,在置入 CVC 时应慎重考虑。

相似文献

1
Peripherally inserted central catheters lead to a high risk of venous thromboembolism in children.外周置入中心静脉导管会导致儿童发生静脉血栓栓塞的风险增加。
Blood. 2020 Jan 16;135(3):220-226. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019002260.
2
Peripherally inserted central catheters are associated with lower risk of bloodstream infection compared with central venous catheters in paediatric intensive care patients: a propensity-adjusted analysis.外周置入中心静脉导管与中心静脉导管相比,与儿科重症监护患者的血流感染风险较低:一项倾向调整分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Aug;43(8):1097-1104. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4852-7. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
3
Comparative thrombosis risk of vascular access devices among critically ill medical patients.危重症医学患者血管通路装置的血栓形成风险比较。
Thromb Res. 2018 Dec;172:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
4
Lower risk of bloodstream infections for peripherally inserted central catheters compared to central venous catheters in critically ill patients.与中心静脉导管相比,外周静脉置入中心静脉导管在危重症患者中降低血流感染风险。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Nov 9;11(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01180-1.
5
The risk of bloodstream infection associated with peripherally inserted central catheters compared with central venous catheters in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人外周静脉置入中心静脉导管与中心静脉导管相关血流感染风险的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;34(9):908-18. doi: 10.1086/671737. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
6
The idle central venous catheter in the NICU: When should it be removed?新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中的闲置中心静脉导管:何时应予以拔除?
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Jul;53(7):1414-1416. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.10.060. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
7
Peripherally inserted central catheters have a protective role and the effect of fluctuation curve feature in the risk of bloodstream infection compared with central venous catheters: a propensity-adjusted analysis.与中心静脉导管相比,外周置入中心静脉导管具有保护作用和波动曲线特征对血流感染风险的影响:倾向评分调整分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 26;22(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07265-x.
8
Line days as a determinant of central line-associated bloodstream infections in pediatric patients with tunneled femoral peripherally inserted central catheters.隧道式股外周置入中心静脉导管的儿科患者中,留置天数是中心静脉相关血流感染的决定因素。
Pediatr Radiol. 2021 Jul;51(8):1481-1486. doi: 10.1007/s00247-021-05019-6. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
9
Comparison of outcomes of central venous catheters in patients with solid and hematologic neoplasms: an Italian real-world analysis.实体瘤和血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中心静脉导管置管效果的比较:意大利真实世界分析。
Tumori. 2021 Feb;107(1):17-25. doi: 10.1177/0300891620931172. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
10
Peripherally inserted central catheters versus non-tunnelled ultrasound-guided central venous catheters in newborns: a retrospective observational study.新生儿外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管与非隧道式超声引导中心静脉导管的比较:一项回顾性观察研究
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 6;12(4):e058866. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058866.

引用本文的文献

1
The balancing act after pediatric venous thromboembolism.小儿静脉血栓栓塞后的平衡行为
Blood Adv. 2025 Aug 12;9(15):3905-3906. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016871.
2
Catheter and Non-Catheter-Related Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients: Survival, Anticoagulation Efficacy, and Safety.癌症患者的导管和非导管相关静脉血栓栓塞症:生存、抗凝疗效和安全性。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024 Jan-Dec;30:10760296241282771. doi: 10.1177/10760296241282771.
3
Risk factors of bloodstream infection after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in children/adolescent and young adults.
儿童、青少年和青年成人异基因造血细胞移植后血流感染的危险因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 7;19(8):e0308395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308395. eCollection 2024.
4
Preventing adverse events during paediatric cancer treatment: protocol for a multi-site hybrid randomised controlled trial of catheter lock solutions (the CLOCK trial).预防儿科癌症治疗中的不良事件:导管锁溶液的多中心混合随机对照试验方案(CLOCK 试验)。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 9;14(7):e085637. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085637.
5
Risk factors and incidence of central venous access device-related thrombosis in hospitalized children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.住院儿童中心静脉通路装置相关血栓形成的危险因素及发生率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Pediatr Res. 2024 Dec;96(7):1568-1593. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03225-0. Epub 2024 May 17.
6
Aligning Patient Safety and Stewardship: A Harm Reduction Strategy for Children.协调患者安全与管理:儿童减少伤害策略
Curr Treat Options Pediatr. 2021;7(3):138-151. doi: 10.1007/s40746-021-00227-6. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
7
Development and validation of a nomogram model for central venous access device-related thrombosis in hospitalized children.住院患儿中心静脉置管相关血栓形成的列线图模型的建立与验证。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Nov;182(11):4909-4919. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05078-x. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
8
Evaluation of venous thromboembolism risk factors reveals subtype heterogenicity in children with central venous catheters: a multicenter study from the Children's Hospital Acquired Thrombosis consortium.评估静脉血栓栓塞风险因素揭示了中心静脉置管患儿的亚类异质性:来自儿童获得性血栓形成联盟的一项多中心研究。
J Thromb Haemost. 2023 Sep;21(9):2441-2450. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.03.045. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
9
COVID-19-induced coagulopathy: Experience, achievements, prospects.COVID-19 诱导的凝血病:经验、成就、展望。
Cardiol J. 2023;30(3):453-461. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0123. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
10
Risk factors for central venous catheter-related thrombosis in hospitalized children: a single-center a retrospective cohort study.住院儿童中心静脉导管相关血栓形成的危险因素:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Transl Pediatr. 2022 Nov;11(11):1840-1851. doi: 10.21037/tp-22-529.