Ipsos US Public Affairs, San Antonio, Texas 2020 K St NW Suite #410, Washington DC 20006.
US Navy, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, 7700 Arlington Blvd, Suite 5113, Falls Church VA 22042.
Mil Med. 2020 Aug 14;185(7-8):e1193-e1199. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz463.
Access to care (ATC) is an important component of providing quality healthcare. Clinics need to be able to accurately measure access; however, patients' reports of access may be different from performance-based data gathered using administrative measures. The purpose of this research is to examine the relationship between ATC administrative data and patient survey results.
This is a retrospective study performed in military medical treatment facilities. Survey data were obtained from the Joint Outpatient Experience Survey (JOES), and administrative data were collected from the Military Health System Data Repository. The data period was from May 2016 through March 2017 for 135 parent Military Treatment Facilities. This study was approved under the Defense Health Agency Internal Review Board (IRB number: CDO-15-2025). The analyses compare JOES ATC measures to administrative ATC measures. Overall correlation analyses and multivariate regression analyses were performed in order to generate observable correlations between access and healthcare measures (both administrative measures and patient survey items).
Results show moderate correlations between the facilities' ATC survey items and administrative measures. These correlations were affected by the composition of the facility patient mix. The patient-based ATC measures from the JOES survey are related to administrative ATC measures collected and monitored by the facilities. In each final regression model, the coefficients for the ATC administrative variables were significant and negative which indicates that as the wait time for an appointment increases, patients' ratings of the time between scheduling and appointment dates declines and patients' assessments of being able to see a provider declines as well.
Measuring ATC is a vital step in ensuring the health of patients and the provision of high quality care. Both patient surveys and administrative data are widely used for measuring ATC. This study found statistically significant moderate associations between survey and administrative ATC measures, which remained significant even after controlling for patient characteristics of the facilities. These study results suggest that administrative data can provide an accurate assessment of access; however, survey items can be useful for diagnosing potential issues with access, such as call center scheduling and provider availability. Future studies should explore the gaps in research surrounding best practices at facilities which have high patient experience with access, and look at other survey measures related to access, such as telephone resources and web-based communication programs.
医疗服务可及性(ATC)是提供高质量医疗保健的重要组成部分。诊所需要能够准确衡量 ATC;然而,患者对 ATC 的报告可能与使用行政措施收集的基于绩效的数据不同。本研究的目的是检验 ATC 行政数据与患者调查结果之间的关系。
这是一项在军事医疗设施中进行的回顾性研究。调查数据来自联合门诊体验调查(JOES),行政数据来自军事卫生系统数据存储库。数据期为 2016 年 5 月至 2017 年 3 月,涉及 135 个母军事治疗设施。本研究经国防卫生局内部审查委员会批准(IRB 编号:CDO-15-2025)。分析将 JOES ATC 测量值与行政 ATC 测量值进行比较。为了生成 ATC 与医疗保健措施(行政措施和患者调查项目)之间的可观察相关性,进行了总体相关性分析和多元回归分析。
结果表明,设施的 ATC 调查项目与行政措施之间存在中度相关性。这些相关性受到设施患者组合构成的影响。JOES 调查中的基于患者的 ATC 测量值与设施收集和监测的行政 ATC 测量值相关。在每个最终回归模型中,ATC 行政变量的系数均为显著且为负,这表明随着预约等待时间的增加,患者对预约日期与预约日期之间的时间的评分下降,患者对能够看到提供者的评估也下降。
衡量 ATC 是确保患者健康和提供高质量护理的重要步骤。患者调查和行政数据都广泛用于衡量 ATC。本研究发现,调查和行政 ATC 测量值之间存在统计学上显著的中度关联,即使在控制设施患者特征后,这种关联仍然显著。这些研究结果表明,行政数据可以提供对 ATC 的准确评估;然而,调查项目可用于诊断 ATC 方面的潜在问题,例如呼叫中心调度和提供者可用性。未来的研究应该探索在具有较高患者 ATC 体验的设施中围绕最佳实践的研究差距,并研究与 ATC 相关的其他调查措施,例如电话资源和基于网络的通信计划。