Tischer Tina S, Nitschke Daniel, Krause Isabelle, Kundt Günther, Öner Alper, D'Ancona Giuseppe, Şafak Erdal, Ince Hüseyin, Ortak Jasmin, Caglayan Evren
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Rostock, Germany.
Institute for Biostatistics and Informatics in Medicine and Ageing Research, University Hospital, Rostock, Germany.
Cardiol Res Pract. 2019 Dec 14;2019:7216598. doi: 10.1155/2019/7216598. eCollection 2019.
In atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, the effect of catheter ablation or drug therapy on cognition is currently not well investigated. Therefore, we prospectively evaluated AF patients who were either treated 'with drug therapy or underwent catheter ablation for the prevalence and progression of cognitive impairment (CI).
Randomized participants of the CABANA trial (catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy for atrial fibrillation) and the CASTLE-AF (catheter ablation versus standard conventional treatment in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and atrial fibrillation) study were assessed twice within 6 months by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in our institution.
Forty-five patients from both trials were investigated, and twenty-eight patients received catheter ablation, whereas seventeen patients received drug therapy for rhythm or rate control. The mean age of the twenty-one CABANA trial patients (AF group) was 68.8 ± 7.0 years and of the twenty-four CASTLE-AF study patients (AF/HF group) was 66.8 ± 8.1 years, respectively. Mean time from ablation/randomization to the first interview was 16.8 ± 11 months in the AF group and 28.3 ± 18.4 months in the AF/HF group, respectively. All patients investigated were classified as cognitively impaired with mean cutoff scores <24 by MoCA. Overall, we could not detect significant differences in medically treated versus catheter ablation patients within both groups in mean MMSE or MoCA scores between the first and the second interview ( > 0.09). Moreover, patients who received catheter ablation did not show statistically significant differences in the prevalence or progression of cognitive impairment compared to patients who were treated medically, neither within the two groups nor between AF and AF/HF patients ( > 0.05).
Prevalence of cognitive impairment in AF patients with comorbidities is substantial. However, in this preliminary prospective study, no apparent impact of AF pretreatment on the prevalence and course of cognitive impairment could be observed.
在心房颤动(AF)患者中,导管消融或药物治疗对认知的影响目前尚未得到充分研究。因此,我们前瞻性地评估了接受药物治疗或接受导管消融的AF患者认知障碍(CI)的患病率和进展情况。
对CABANA试验(导管消融与抗心律失常药物治疗心房颤动)和CASTLE-AF(左心室功能障碍和心房颤动患者的导管消融与标准传统治疗)研究的随机参与者,在我们机构内于6个月内通过蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)和简易精神状态检查(MMSE)进行了两次评估。
对两项试验中的45例患者进行了研究,28例患者接受了导管消融,而17例患者接受了药物治疗以控制心律或心率。21例CABANA试验患者(AF组)的平均年龄为68.8±7.0岁,24例CASTLE-AF研究患者(AF/HF组)的平均年龄为66.8±8.1岁。AF组从消融/随机分组到首次访谈的平均时间分别为16.8±11个月,AF/HF组为28.3±18.4个月。所有接受调查的患者通过MoCA评估均被分类为认知障碍,平均临界值分数<24分。总体而言,我们未发现两组中接受药物治疗与导管消融的患者在首次和第二次访谈之间的平均MMSE或MoCA评分存在显著差异(>0.09)。此外,接受导管消融的患者与接受药物治疗的患者相比,在认知障碍的患病率或进展方面,无论是在两组内还是在AF与AF/HF患者之间,均未显示出统计学上的显著差异(>0.05)。
合并症的AF患者中认知障碍的患病率很高。然而,在这项初步的前瞻性研究中,未观察到AF预处理对认知障碍的患病率和病程有明显影响。