Erlikhman Gennady, Lytchenko Taissa, Heller Nathan H, Maechler Marvin R, Caplovitz Gideon P
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 2349 Franz Hall, 405 Hilgard Ave, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 May;82(4):1599-1612. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01964-5.
When a part of an object is cued, targets presented in other locations on the same object are detected more rapidly and accurately than are targets on other objects. Often in object-based attention experiments, cues and targets appear not only on the same object but also on the same surface. In four psychophysical experiments, we examined whether the "object" of attentional selection was the entire object or one of its surfaces. In Experiment 1, facilitation effects were found for targets on uncued, adjacent surfaces on the same object, even when the cued and uncued surfaces were oriented differently in depth. This suggests that the "object-based" benefits of attention are not restricted to individual surfaces. Experiments 2a and 2b examined the interaction of perceptual grouping and object-based attention. In both experiments, cuing benefits extended across objects when the surfaces of those objects could be grouped, but the effects were not as strong as in Experiment 1, where the surfaces belonged to the same object. The cuing effect was strengthened in Experiment 3 by connecting the cued and target surfaces with an intermediate surface, making them appear to all belong to the same object. Together, the experiments suggest that the objects of attention do not necessarily map onto discrete physical objects defined by bounded surfaces. Instead, attentional selection can be allocated to perceptual groups of surfaces and objects in the same way as it can to a location or to groups of features that define a single object.
当一个物体的一部分被提示时,与其他物体上的目标相比,出现在同一物体其他位置的目标能被更快、更准确地检测到。在基于物体的注意力实验中,提示和目标不仅经常出现在同一物体上,还出现在同一表面上。在四项心理物理学实验中,我们研究了注意力选择的“物体”是整个物体还是其表面之一。在实验1中,即使提示和未提示的表面在深度上方向不同,在同一物体上未提示的相邻表面上的目标也发现了促进效应。这表明基于“物体”的注意力益处并不局限于单个表面。实验2a和2b研究了知觉分组与基于物体的注意力的相互作用。在这两个实验中,当那些物体的表面可以被分组时,提示益处会跨越物体,但效果不如实验1中那么强,在实验1中表面属于同一物体。在实验3中,通过用一个中间表面连接提示和目标表面,使它们看起来都属于同一物体,从而增强了提示效果。这些实验共同表明,注意力的物体不一定对应于由有界表面定义的离散物理物体。相反,注意力选择可以像分配到一个位置或定义单个物体的特征组一样,分配到表面和物体的知觉组上。