Ikawa Fusao, Michihata Nobuaki, Akiyama Yasuhiko, Iihara Koji, Morita Akio, Kato Yoko, Yamaguchi Shuhei, Kurisu Kaoru, Fushimi Kiyohide, Yasunaga Hideo
Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
World Neurosurg. 2020 Apr;136:e371-e379. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.005. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
This study aimed to compare the functional outcome at discharge for unruptured cerebral aneurysms (UCAs) between surgical clipping and endovascular coiling in total, nonelderly (<65 years), and elderly (≥65 years) patients by nonbiased analysis based on a national database in Japan.
A total of 15,671 patients with UCA were registered in the Diagnosis Procedure Combination, the nationwide database, from 2010 to 2015 in Japan. The outcome of the Barthel Index (BI) at discharge was investigated, and propensity score-matched analysis was conducted in total, nonelderly, and elderly patient groups.
Propensity score-matched analysis found no significant difference for in-hospital mortality between the 2 treatment methods in the total and both age-groups. The rate of morbidity of BI <90 at discharge was higher after surgical clipping than after endovascular coiling in the total (4.9% vs. 3.9%; P = 0.040; risk difference, -1.0%; 95% confidence interval, -3.6 to 2.3%) and the elderly age-group (8.1% vs. 5.0%; P < 0.001; risk difference, -3.1%; -4.8% to 1.5%), however, no significant association between the 2 treatment methods (2.4% vs. 2.6%; P = 0.67; risk difference, 0.22%; -0.79 to 1.22%) was found in the nonelderly group.
In elderly patients with UCA, a better outcome at discharge after endovascular coiling was found. However, no significantly different functional outcome at discharge between surgical clipping and endovascular coiling for UCA in nonelderly patients was confirmed by propensity score-matched analysis from a nationwide database in Japan.
本研究旨在通过基于日本全国数据库的无偏分析,比较手术夹闭和血管内栓塞治疗未破裂脑动脉瘤(UCA)的老年(≥65岁)、非老年(<65岁)患者及所有患者出院时的功能结局。
2010年至2015年期间,日本全国数据库“诊断程序组合”中登记了总共15671例UCA患者。研究了出院时巴氏指数(BI)的结局,并在所有患者、非老年患者和老年患者组中进行了倾向评分匹配分析。
倾向评分匹配分析发现,在所有患者以及两个年龄组中,两种治疗方法的院内死亡率无显著差异。在所有患者(4.9%对3.9%;P = 0.040;风险差异,-1.0%;95%置信区间,-3.6至2.3%)和老年患者组(8.1%对5.0%;P < 0.001;风险差异,-3.1%;-4.8%至1.5%)中,出院时BI<90的发病率在手术夹闭后高于血管内栓塞后,然而,在非老年患者组中未发现两种治疗方法之间存在显著关联(2.4%对2.6%;P = 0.67;风险差异,0.22%;-0.79至1.22%)。
在老年UCA患者中,血管内栓塞后出院时的结局更好。然而,通过日本全国数据库的倾向评分匹配分析,未证实非老年患者中手术夹闭和血管内栓塞治疗UCA出院时的功能结局有显著差异。