Research Center for Eco-environmental Engineering, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan, Guangdong, 523808, China; Institute of Environmental & Ecological Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, China.
Research Center for Eco-environmental Engineering, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan, Guangdong, 523808, China.
Water Res. 2020 Mar 15;171:115457. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115457. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
Although estimates of total CO emissions from global estuaries are gradually decreasing, current numbers are based on limited data and the impacts of anthropogenic and seasonal disturbances have not been studied extensively. Our study estimates annual and seasonal CO fluxes in China's Yellow River Estuary (YRE) which incorporated spatiotemporal variations and the effects of water and sediment regulation (WSR). Aquatic metabolism was estimated using Odum's open water dissolved oxygen methods and used to represent the production and assimilation of CO. Net ecosystem production (NEP) was used to represent the CO flux from biological activities and estimate the major CO emitters in the YRE. According to our measurements, the annual CO release was 6.14 ± 33.63 mol C m yr from 2009 to 2013 and the annual CO efflux from the 1521.3 km of estuarine surface area was 0.11 ± 0.61 Tg C yr in the YRE. High CO emissions in autumn were balanced by high CO sequestration in summer, leading to a lower than expected annual net CO efflux. The system is an atmospheric CO source in spring and winter, near neutral in early summer, a large sink in late summer after WSR, and finally a large atmospheric CO source in autumn. Discharge events and seasonality jointly affect estuarine CO flux. High CO sequestration in summer is due mainly to a combination of high water temperature, chlorophyll a levels, dissolved inorganic carbon, and solar radiation and low turbidity, discharge, and chemical oxygen demand (COD) after WSR. WSR supports the high gross primary productivity rate which exceeds the increase in ecosystem respiration. Although the YRE, as a whole, is a source of atmospheric CO, the amount of CO released is lower than the average estuarine value of mid-latitude regions. Our findings therefore suggest that global CO release from estuarine systems is overestimated if spatiotemporal variations and the effects of anthropogenic disturbance are excluded. The NEP method is effective for estimating the CO flux, especially in estuaries where CO variation is mainly due to biological processes.
尽管全球河口的总 CO 排放量估计正在逐渐减少,但目前的数据基于有限的数据,并且尚未广泛研究人为和季节性干扰的影响。我们的研究估计了中国黄河口(YRE)的年际和季节性 CO 通量,其中包括时空变化和水沙调节(WSR)的影响。水生代谢是使用 Odum 的开阔水域溶解氧方法估算的,用于代表 CO 的产生和同化。净生态系统生产(NEP)用于代表生物活动产生的 CO 通量,并估计 YRE 中的主要 CO 排放源。根据我们的测量结果,2009 年至 2013 年期间,每年从黄河口 1521.3 公里的河口表面释放的 CO 为 6.14±33.63mol C m yr,每年从 1521.3 公里的河口表面释放的 CO 为 0.11±0.61Tg C yr。秋季的高 CO 排放被夏季的高 CO 固存所平衡,导致年净 CO 通量低于预期。该系统在春季和冬季是大气 CO 的源,初夏接近中性,WSR 后夏季后期是大气 CO 的大汇,秋季是大气 CO 的大源。排放事件和季节性共同影响河口 CO 通量。夏季 CO 固存高主要是由于水温、叶绿素 a 水平、溶解无机碳和太阳辐射高,以及浊度、排放和化学需氧量(COD)低,WSR 后造成的。WSR 支持高的总初级生产力,超过了生态系统呼吸的增加。尽管黄河口作为一个整体是大气 CO 的源,但释放的 CO 量低于中纬度地区的平均河口值。因此,如果排除时空变化和人为干扰的影响,我们的研究结果表明,全球河口系统释放的 CO 量被高估了。NEP 方法对于估计 CO 通量是有效的,特别是在 CO 变化主要是由于生物过程的河口。