Suppr超能文献

Bluebelle 试验性随机对照研究三种伤口敷料策略,以减少原发性手术伤口的手术部位感染。

Bluebelle pilot randomised controlled trial of three wound dressing strategies to reduce surgical site infection in primary surgical wounds.

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 12;10(1):e030615. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030615.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Surgical site infection (SSI) affects up to 25% of primary surgical wounds. Dressing strategies may influence SSI risk. The Bluebelle study assessed the feasibility of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different dressing strategies to reduce SSI in primary surgical wounds.

DESIGN

A pilot, factorial RCT.

SETTING

Five UK hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults undergoing abdominal surgery with a primary surgical wound.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomised to 'simple dressing', 'glue-as-a-dressing' or 'no dressing', and to the time at which the treatment allocation was disclosed to the surgeon (disclosure time, before or after wound closure).

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Feasibility outcomes focused on recruitment, adherence to randomised allocations, reference assessment of SSI and response rates to participant-completed and observer-completed questionnaires to assess SSI (proposed primary outcome for main trial), wound experience and symptoms, and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L).

RESULTS

Between March and November 2016, 1115 patients were screened; 699 (73.4%) were eligible and approached, 415 (59.4%) consented and 394 (35.3%) were randomised (simple dressing=133, glue=129 and 'no dressing'=132). Non-adherence to dressing allocation was 2% (3/133), 6% (8/129) and 15% (20/132), respectively. Adherence to disclosure time was 99% and 86% before and after wound closure, respectively. The overall rate of SSI (reference assessment) was 18.1% (51/281). Response rates to the Wound Healing Questionnaire and other questionnaires ranged from >90% at 4 days to 68% at 4-8 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

A definitive RCT of dressing strategies including 'no dressing' is feasible. Further work is needed to optimise questionnaire response rates.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

49328913; Pre-results.

摘要

目的

手术部位感染(SSI)影响高达 25%的原发性手术伤口。敷料策略可能会影响 SSI 风险。Bluebelle 研究评估了一项多中心随机对照试验(RCT)的可行性,以评估不同敷料策略在降低原发性手术伤口 SSI 方面的有效性和成本效益。

设计

一项先导性、析因 RCT。

设置

五家英国医院。

参与者

接受腹部手术且有原发性手术伤口的成年人。

干预措施

参与者被随机分配到“简单敷料”、“胶作为敷料”或“无敷料”,以及外科医生何时获知治疗分配(披露时间,在伤口闭合之前或之后)。

主要和次要结果测量

可行性结果集中在招募、对随机分配的依从性、SSI 的参考评估以及参与者完成和观察者完成的问卷对 SSI 的反应率(主要试验的拟议主要结局)、伤口体验和症状以及生活质量(EQ-5D-5L)。

结果

在 2016 年 3 月至 11 月期间,对 1115 名患者进行了筛查;699 名(73.4%)符合条件并被接触,415 名(59.4%)同意,394 名(35.3%)被随机分配(简单敷料=133,胶=129,“无敷料”=132)。不遵守敷料分配的比例分别为 2%(3/133)、6%(8/129)和 15%(20/132)。在伤口闭合前后,披露时间的依从率分别为 99%和 86%。(参考评估)的 SSI 总体发生率为 18.1%(51/281)。伤口愈合问卷和其他问卷的应答率范围从第 4 天的>90%到第 4-8 周的 68%。

结论

包括“无敷料”的敷料策略的确定性 RCT 是可行的。需要进一步工作来优化问卷的应答率。

试验注册号

49328913;预结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40e3/7045119/b4019dd7ca34/bmjopen-2019-030615f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验