Kataoka Shohei, Kato Ken, Tanaka Hiroyuki, Tejima Tamotsu
Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
J Cardiol Cases. 2019 Aug 22;20(4):138-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2019.08.001. eCollection 2019 Oct.
It is challenging to perform ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) from the left ventricle (LV) in patients without catheter access to the LV. A 50-year-old man was referred to our hospital for VT. He underwent mechanical aortic and mitral valve replacement for infective endocarditis and embolic myocardial infarction in the left ventricular inferior wall during a surgery. Anti-arrhythmia drugs (AADs) such as sotalol and bisoprolol were initiated and implantable cardioverter defibrillator was implanted. However, 2 months after discharge, he was admitted again for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection and underwent complete CIED system removal. During hospitalization, VT easily occurred despite the use of AADs. We decided to perform transcoronary chemical ablation to treat this drug-refractory VT. A 0.014-inch guide-wire and a micro-catheter were advanced into coronary arteries. Pace map was conducted using a guide-wire and the micro artery branch feeding the VT exit area was detected. Ethanol infusion to this branch and the slightly basal side of the area eliminated the VT. We successfully treated VT in the no-entry LV by wire-guided mapping and ethanol ablation via coronary arteries. VT has not recurred during the follow-up period of 12 months. < It is challenging to perform ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in patients with mechanical aortic and mitral valve replacement, because there is no catheter access to the left ventricle. Mapping via coronary arteries using guide-wires enables pace-mapping, finding VT exit sites, and identification of the appropriate branches for ethanol infusion. Therefore, transcoronary mapping and chemical ablation may be an alternative treatment for VT in a no entry left ventricle situation.>.
对于没有导管进入左心室的患者,从左心室进行室性心动过速(VT)消融具有挑战性。一名50岁男性因室性心动过速被转诊至我院。他曾因感染性心内膜炎接受机械主动脉瓣和二尖瓣置换术,并在手术期间发生左心室下壁栓塞性心肌梗死。开始使用索他洛尔和比索洛尔等抗心律失常药物(AADs),并植入了植入式心脏复律除颤器。然而,出院2个月后,他因心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)感染再次入院,并接受了完整的CIED系统移除。住院期间,尽管使用了AADs,室性心动过速仍很容易发生。我们决定进行经冠状动脉化学消融来治疗这种药物难治性室性心动过速。将一根0.014英寸的导丝和一根微导管推进冠状动脉。使用导丝进行起搏标测,并检测到为室性心动过速出口区域供血的微动脉分支。向该分支及其区域稍靠基底侧注入乙醇消除了室性心动过速。我们通过导丝引导标测和经冠状动脉乙醇消融成功治疗了左心室无法进入患者的室性心动过速。在12个月的随访期内,室性心动过速未复发。<对于接受机械主动脉瓣和二尖瓣置换术的患者,进行室性心动过速(VT)消融具有挑战性,因为没有导管进入左心室。使用导丝通过冠状动脉进行标测能够进行起搏标测、找到室性心动过速出口部位并识别适合注入乙醇的分支。因此,经冠状动脉标测和化学消融可能是左心室无法进入情况下室性心动过速的一种替代治疗方法。>