Suppr超能文献

当前社区获得性肺炎老年患者治疗和护理的临床实践与基于证据的指南之间存在差距:一项描述性横断面研究。

Gaps between current clinical practice and evidence-based guidelines for treatment and care of older patients with Community Acquired Pneumonia: a descriptive cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, P.O. Box 157, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden.

Research Unit for Clinical Nursing, Department of Internal Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Jan 23;20(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4742-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a significant cause of morbidity and in-hospital mortality, and readmission rates are rising for older persons (> 65 years). Optimized treatment and nursing care will benefit patients and the health economy. Hence, there is a need to describe gaps between current clinical practice and recommendations in evidence-based guidelines for diagnostic procedures, medical treatment and nursing interventions for older patients with CAP.

METHODS

Structured observations, individual ad hoc interviews and audits of patient records were carried out in an emergency department and three medical units. Data were analysed by manifest content analysis and descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Thirty patients (median age 74 years) admitted with CAP and 86 physicians, nurses, physiotherapists were included. The median length of stay (LOS) was 6.5 days, in-hospital mortality was10 and 40.7% were readmitted within one month. The severity assessment tool (CURB-65) was used in 16.7% of the patients, correct antibiotic treatment prescribed for 13.3% and chest radiography (≤6 weeks post-discharge) prescribed for 22.2%. Fluid therapy, nutrition support and mobilisation plans were found to be developed sporadically, and interventions to be performed unsystematically and sparingly. Positive Expiratory Pressure therapy and oral care were the nursing interventions with lowest adherence, ranging from 18.2 to 55.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to recommendations was low for several central treatment and nursing care interventions for patients with CAP with possible consequences for patients and the use of resources. Thus, there is an urgent need to identify and remove barriers to adherence to recommendations in the neglected areas in view of the potential to improve patient outcomes.

摘要

背景

社区获得性肺炎(CAP)仍然是发病率和住院死亡率的重要原因,老年人(>65 岁)的再入院率正在上升。优化治疗和护理将使患者和卫生经济受益。因此,有必要描述当前临床实践与基于证据的指南中关于诊断程序、医疗治疗和护理干预的差距,这些指南针对的是患有 CAP 的老年患者。

方法

在急诊科和三个医疗病房进行了结构化观察、个别专题访谈和病历审核。数据采用显式内容分析和描述性统计进行分析。

结果

30 名(中位年龄 74 岁)患有 CAP 的患者和 86 名医生、护士、物理治疗师被纳入研究。中位住院时间(LOS)为 6.5 天,住院死亡率为 10%,40.7%的患者在一个月内再次入院。16.7%的患者使用了严重程度评估工具(CURB-65),13.3%的患者使用了正确的抗生素治疗,22.2%的患者在出院后 6 周内进行了胸部 X 光检查。发现液体疗法、营养支持和运动计划的制定较为零散,干预措施的执行也不系统和节约。正压通气治疗和口腔护理是护理干预措施中依从性最低的,分别为 18.2%至 55.6%。

结论

对 CAP 患者的几项核心治疗和护理干预措施的建议遵循率较低,这可能对患者和资源利用产生影响。因此,迫切需要确定并消除在被忽视领域中建议遵循的障碍,以期改善患者结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f69f/6979078/c0940f7533fa/12879_2019_4742_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验