Department of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital - Psychiatry, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Apr;141(4):316-326. doi: 10.1111/acps.13154. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
Treatment with thyroid hormones is occasionally used in the management of treatment-resistant depression. However, the evidence supporting this treatment is not fully established. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on the effect of adjunctive thyroid hormone in the management of treatment-resistant unipolar depression and to provide a pooled estimate of its efficacy.
The study is registered with PROSPERO (reg. no. CRD42018108088) and followed the PRISMA guidelines. Searches were carried out on June 24, 2019, in PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. Each record was screened independently by at least two reviewers. In instances of discrepancies, consensus was reached upon discussion. Pooled efficacy estimates were calculated based on response rates (decrease of ≥50% on the primary outcome measure) using random effect statistics.
The search yielded 1355 records. Based on the screening of these records, we identified 10 studies that met the inclusion criteria (total number of patients = 663). The comparison of response to thyroid hormones vs. placebo resulted in an odds ratio of 1.56 (95% CI: 0.50-4.84). Similarly, the comparison of response to thyroid hormones vs. lithium resulted in an odds ratio of 1.91 (95% CI: 0.85-4.26). Thus, adjunctive therapy with thyroid hormones was not superior to placebo or lithium in the management of treatment-resistant unipolar depression.
According to this review and meta-analysis, there is not sufficient evidence to support the use of adjunctive thyroid hormones for treatment-resistant unipolar depression.
甲状腺激素治疗偶尔用于治疗抵抗性抑郁症的治疗。然而,支持这种治疗的证据尚未完全确定。本研究的目的是系统地综述辅助甲状腺激素治疗治疗抵抗性单相抑郁症的文献,并提供其疗效的汇总估计。
该研究在 PROSPERO(注册号 CRD42018108088)中注册,并遵循 PRISMA 指南。于 2019 年 6 月 24 日在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 PsycINFO 上进行了检索。至少有两名评审员独立筛选了每条记录。在出现差异的情况下,通过讨论达成共识。根据应答率(主要结局指标下降≥50%),使用随机效应统计计算汇总疗效估计值。
搜索结果为 1355 条记录。根据对这些记录的筛选,我们确定了 10 项符合纳入标准的研究(总患者人数=663 人)。甲状腺激素与安慰剂相比的应答率比较得出的比值比为 1.56(95%CI:0.50-4.84)。同样,甲状腺激素与锂相比的应答率比较得出的比值比为 1.91(95%CI:0.85-4.26)。因此,辅助治疗用甲状腺激素在治疗抵抗性单相抑郁症方面并不优于安慰剂或锂。
根据本综述和荟萃分析,没有足够的证据支持在治疗抵抗性单相抑郁症中使用辅助甲状腺激素。