Marjanovic Dragoslava, Plesinac Karapandzic Vesna, Stojanovic Rundic Suzana, Tomasevic Aleksandar, Saric Milan, Miskovic Ivana, Nidzovic Borko, Petrasinovic Predrag
Department of Radiotherapy, Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
J BUON. 2019 Nov-Dec;24(6):2347-2354.
PURPOSE: The toxicity of postoperative radiotherapy for cervical cancer affects patients' quality of life. We evaluated acute toxicity in postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) as well as the influence of dosimetric parameters and concomitant chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 45 patients with early operable cervical cancer underwent postoperative IMRT with 40-45 Gy. The control group of 50 patients was treated with 3DCRT. Brachytherapy and concomitant cisplatin chemotherapy were performed in all patients according to pathologic and histologic findings. The patients were monitored for acute gastrointestinal, urological and hematological toxicity classified according to the RTOG acute radiation morbidity scoring criteria. We also analyzed the influence of dosimetric parameters on acute toxicity. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in overall acute toxicity (p=0.018), acute genitourinary toxicity (p=0.029), anemia (p=0.043) and neutropenia (p=0.027) but not in acute gastrointestinal toxicity between the IMRT and 3DCRT groups. In all patients, regarding chemotherapy administration, differences were found between the chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy group as far as overall acute toxicity (CHRT vs RT; p=0.011) and hematological toxicity were concerned (p=0.001). Patients with ≥3 cycles of chemotherapy showed increased hematologic toxicity. In the IMRT group according to the administration of chemotherapy (chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy), statistically significant difference for leukopenia (p=0.009) was found and in the 3DCRT group for anemia (p=0.021) and neutropenia (p=0.029). According to chemotherapy administration (chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy), a statistically significant difference in leukopenia (p=0.009) was found in the IMRT group while in the 3DCRT group the differences were in anemia (p=0.021) and neutropenia (p=0.029). CONCLUSION: IMRT is associated with lower acute toxicity and better dosimetric parameters in organs at risk (OAR) compared to 3DCRT. Higher hematological toxicity occurred when concomitant chemotherapy was performed, regardless of RT technique. Further reduction of toxicity is expected with protocol and technical improvement and research of gene-related toxicity.
目的:宫颈癌术后放疗的毒性会影响患者的生活质量。我们评估了术后调强放疗(IMRT)和三维适形放疗(3DCRT)的急性毒性以及剂量学参数和同步化疗的影响。 方法:共有45例早期可手术宫颈癌患者接受了40 - 45 Gy的术后IMRT。50例患者的对照组接受3DCRT治疗。根据病理和组织学结果,所有患者均进行了近距离放疗和同步顺铂化疗。根据RTOG急性放射病发病率评分标准对患者的急性胃肠道、泌尿系统和血液学毒性进行监测。我们还分析了剂量学参数对急性毒性的影响。 结果:IMRT组和3DCRT组在总体急性毒性(p = 0.018)、急性泌尿生殖系统毒性(p = 0.029)、贫血(p = 0.043)和中性粒细胞减少(p = 0.027)方面存在显著差异,但在急性胃肠道毒性方面无显著差异。在所有患者中,就化疗给药而言,同步放化疗组和放疗组在总体急性毒性(CHRT与RT;p = 0.011)和血液学毒性(p = 0.001)方面存在差异。接受≥3周期化疗的患者血液学毒性增加。在IMRT组中,根据化疗给药情况(同步放化疗与放疗),发现白细胞减少有统计学显著差异(p = 0.009),在3DCRT组中,贫血(p = 0.021)和中性粒细胞减少(p = 0.029)有统计学显著差异。根据化疗给药情况(同步放化疗与放疗),IMRT组白细胞减少有统计学显著差异(p = 0.009),而在3DCRT组中,差异在于贫血(p = 0.021)和中性粒细胞减少(p = 0.029)。 结论:与3结论:与3DCRT相比,IMRT的急性毒性更低,对危及器官(OAR)的剂量学参数更好。无论放疗技术如何,同步化疗时血液学毒性更高。随着方案和技术的改进以及基因相关毒性的研究,有望进一步降低毒性。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2021-2