• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[人工智能系统在进行诊断时的推理方式与临床医生相同吗?]

[Do artificial intelligence systems reason in the same way as clinicians when making diagnoses?].

作者信息

Pelaccia T, Forestier G, Wemmert C

机构信息

Centre de formation et de recherche en pédagogie des sciences de la santé, faculté de médecine, université de Strasbourg, 4, rue Kirschleger, 67085 Strasbourg cedex, France; SAMU 67, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, place de l'Hôpital, 67091 Strasbourg cedex, France.

Irimas, université de Haute-Alsace, 6, rue des Frères-Lumière, 68350 Mulhouse, France.

出版信息

Rev Med Interne. 2020 Mar;41(3):192-195. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2019.12.014. Epub 2020 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.revmed.2019.12.014
PMID:31987671
Abstract

Clinical reasoning is at the heart of physicians' competence, as it allows them to make diagnoses. However, diagnostic errors are common, due to the existence of reasoning biases. Artificial intelligence is undergoing unprecedented development in this context. It is increasingly seen as a solution to improve the diagnostic performance of physicians, or even to perform this task for them, in a totally autonomous and more efficient way. In order to understand the challenges associated with the development of artificial intelligence, it is important to understand how the machine works to make diagnoses, what are the similarities and differences with the physician's diagnostic reasoning, and what are the consequences for medical training and practice.

摘要

临床推理是医生能力的核心,因为它使医生能够做出诊断。然而,由于存在推理偏差,诊断错误很常见。在这种背景下,人工智能正在经历前所未有的发展。它越来越被视为一种提高医生诊断性能的解决方案,甚至以一种完全自主且更高效的方式为他们执行这项任务。为了理解与人工智能发展相关的挑战,重要的是要了解机器如何进行诊断,它与医生的诊断推理有哪些异同,以及对医学培训和实践有哪些影响。

相似文献

1
[Do artificial intelligence systems reason in the same way as clinicians when making diagnoses?].[人工智能系统在进行诊断时的推理方式与临床医生相同吗?]
Rev Med Interne. 2020 Mar;41(3):192-195. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2019.12.014. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
2
A causal loop approach to the study of diagnostic errors.一种用于诊断错误研究的因果循环方法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:73-7.
3
[Artificial intelligence: Guidelines for internists].[人工智能:内科医生指南]
Rev Med Interne. 2020 Mar;41(3):189-191. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2019.12.001. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
4
CLINICAL REASONING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: CAN AI REALLY THINK?临床推理与人工智能:人工智能真能思考吗?
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2024;134:133-145.
5
Cognitive aspect of diagnostic errors.诊断错误的认知方面。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2013 Jan;42(1):33-41.
6
Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine.过度自信作为医学诊断错误的一个原因。
Am J Med. 2008 May;121(5 Suppl):S2-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.01.001.
7
Cognitive bias: Its influence on clinical diagnosis.认知偏差:其对临床诊断的影响。
J Fam Pract. 2018 Jun;67(6):366;368;370;372.
8
Diagnostic errors and flaws in clinical reasoning: mechanisms and prevention in practice.临床推理中的诊断错误和缺陷:实践中的机制和预防。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2012 Oct 23;142:w13706. doi: 10.4414/smw.2012.13706. eCollection 2012.
9
[Cognitive errors in diagnostic decision making].[诊断决策中的认知错误]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2017 Oct;167(13-14):333-342. doi: 10.1007/s10354-017-0570-6. Epub 2017 May 23.
10
Role of knowledge and reasoning processes as predictors of resident physicians' susceptibility to anchoring bias in diagnostic reasoning: a randomised controlled experiment.知识和推理过程在预测住院医师诊断推理中易受锚定偏差影响的作用:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Aug 16;33(9):563-572. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016621.

引用本文的文献

1
Deconstructing the diagnostic reasoning of human versus artificial intelligence.剖析人类与人工智能的诊断推理
CMAJ. 2019 Dec 2;191(48):E1332-E1335. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.190506.