• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估低跨瓣压差重度主动脉瓣狭窄和左心室功能保留的预后意义需要结合每搏量计算的一致性和临床数据。

Assessment of the prognostic significance of low gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular function requires the integration of the consistency of stroke volume calculation and clinical data.

作者信息

Shen Hong, Stacey Brandon R, Applegate Robert J, Zhao David, Gandhi Sanjay K, Kon Neal D, Kincaid Edward H, Pu Min

机构信息

Section on Cardiovascular Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Echocardiography. 2020 Jan;37(1):14-21. doi: 10.1111/echo.14561.

DOI:10.1111/echo.14561
PMID:31990437
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of low gradient severe aortic stenosis (LG SAS) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with the integration of echocardiographic and clinical data.

METHODS

The study included 172 patients with LG SAS (AVAi ≤ 0.6 cm /m , mean aortic pressure gradient < 40 mm Hg) and LVEF (≥ 50%). LV outflow tract diameters were measured at both the aortic valve annulus and 5 mm below the annulus for the measurement consistency. Patients were divided into the low flow LG SAS (LF/LG SAS: SVi < 35mL/m and AVAi ≤ 0.6 cm /m ) and normal-flow LG SAS groups (NF/LG SAS: SVi ≥ 35mL/m and AVAi ≤ 0.6 cm /m ). Echocardiographic findings and clinical data were systematically analyzed with mean follow-up of 3.0 ± 1.6 years.

RESULTS

LF/LG SAS had significantly smaller AVAi, lower SVi, a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (28% vs 12% P = .01) and diabetes (47% vs 27% P = .007) and lower 3-year cumulative survival than NF/LG SAS. Multivariable analysis showed that dyspnea, renal dysfunction (CI 1.42-3.99, P < .01), left atrial diameter, and SVi were independently associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality. Aortic valve intervention (AVI) improved survival in LF/LG SAS (68% vs 48%, P < .05) in comparison with medical management (HR: 4.20, CI: 1.12-15.76, P = .03), but only modestly in NF/LG SAS (75% vs 65% P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Outcome of LG SAS was independently associated with clinical characteristics. AVI likely improved outcome of LF/LG SAS who had high-risk clinical characteristics and unfavorable echocardiographic findings.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在结合超声心动图和临床数据,评估低跨瓣压差严重主动脉瓣狭窄(LG SAS)及左心室射血分数(LVEF)保留的预后意义。

方法

本研究纳入172例LG SAS(有效瓣口面积指数[AVAi]≤0.6 cm²/m²,平均主动脉瓣压差<40 mmHg)且LVEF≥50%的患者。在主动脉瓣环及瓣环下方5 mm处测量左心室流出道直径,以确保测量的一致性。患者被分为低流量LG SAS组(LF/LG SAS:每平方米体表面积的每搏量[SVi]<35 mL/m²且AVAi≤0.6 cm²/m²)和正常流量LG SAS组(NF/LG SAS:SVi≥35 mL/m²且AVAi≤0.6 cm²/m²)。对超声心动图检查结果和临床数据进行系统分析,平均随访时间为3.0±1.6年。

结果

LF/LG SAS组的AVAi显著更小,SVi更低,房颤患病率更高(28%对12%,P = 0.01),糖尿病患病率更高(47%对27%,P = 0.007),3年累积生存率低于NF/LG SAS组。多变量分析显示,呼吸困难、肾功能不全(置信区间1.42 - 3.99,P < 0.01)、左心房直径和SVi与全因死亡风险增加独立相关。与药物治疗相比,主动脉瓣介入治疗(AVI)改善了LF/LG SAS组的生存率(68%对48%,P < 0.05)(风险比:4.20,置信区间:1.12 - 15.76,P = 0.03),但在NF/LG SAS组仅略有改善(75%对65%,P > 0.05)。

结论

LG SAS的预后与临床特征独立相关。AVI可能改善了具有高危临床特征和不良超声心动图表现的LF/LG SAS患者的预后。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the prognostic significance of low gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular function requires the integration of the consistency of stroke volume calculation and clinical data.评估低跨瓣压差重度主动脉瓣狭窄和左心室功能保留的预后意义需要结合每搏量计算的一致性和临床数据。
Echocardiography. 2020 Jan;37(1):14-21. doi: 10.1111/echo.14561.
2
Severe aortic stenosis patients with preserved ejection fraction according to flow and gradient classification: Prevalence and outcomes.根据流量和梯度分类的射血分数保留的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者:患病率和结局。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 1;248:211-215. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.064. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
3
Dimensionless Index in Patients With Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction.低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄伴射血分数保留患者的无维度指数。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Oct;13(10):e010925. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.010925. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
4
Outcome of Patients with Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Who Underwent Aortic Valve Replacement.接受主动脉瓣置换术的低流量/低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后
Heart Surg Forum. 2017 Jul 20;20(4):E124-E128. doi: 10.1532/hsf.1709.
5
Outcome of Normal-Flow Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: A Propensity-Matched Study.正常血流低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄伴左心室射血分数保留患者的转归:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Oct;8(19):e012301. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012301. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
6
Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival.射血分数保留的重度主动脉瓣狭窄的血流梯度模式:临床特征和生存预测因素。
Circulation. 2013 Oct 15;128(16):1781-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003695. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
7
Aortic valve area, stroke volume, left ventricular hypertrophy, remodeling, and fibrosis in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between high and low gradient and normal and low flow aortic stenosis.心脏磁共振成像评估主动脉瓣狭窄的瓣口面积、心搏量、左心室肥厚、重构和纤维化:高梯度和低梯度、正常流量和低流量主动脉瓣狭窄的比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Nov;6(6):1009-17. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000515. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
8
Integration of Flow-Gradient Patterns Into Clinical Decision Making for Patients With Suspected Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved LVEF: A Systematic Review of Evidence and Meta-Analysis.血流储备分数与梯度在左心室射血分数保留的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者临床决策中的整合:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Nov;9(11):1255-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.01.035. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
9
Outcome and Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Preserved LVEF and Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.保留射血分数的轻中度主动脉瓣狭窄患者行主动脉瓣置换术的结局和影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 15;66(23):2594-2603. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.076.
10
Impact of low flow on the outcome of high-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.低流量对行经导管主动脉瓣置换术高危患者结局的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Aug 27;62(9):782-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.044. Epub 2013 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Relevance of Gradient and Flow Status in Severe Aortic Stenosis.重度主动脉瓣狭窄中压力阶差和血流状态的预后相关性
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 14;13(20):6113. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206113.
2
Assessment of Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics, and Risk Factors Associated With "Low Flow State" Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.利用心脏磁共振评估与“低流量状态”相关的患病率、临床特征及危险因素
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2023 Sep 29;7(5):443-451. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.08.003. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Echocardiographic Investigation of Low-Flow State in a Hispanic/Latino Population.
西班牙裔/拉丁裔人群低流量状态的超声心动图研究
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2022 Jul 31;6(4):388-397. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2022.05.008. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
Echocardiography and EuroSCORE II for the stratification of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.超声心动图和 EuroSCORE II 对低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄伴左心室射血分数保留患者的分层评估。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Nov;37(11):3169-3176. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02373-2. Epub 2021 Aug 14.