Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney, Sydney.
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Clin J Pain. 2020 May;36(5):399-409. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000809.
Tapentadol (TAP) immediate release (IR) is a newer opioid option for acute pain. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the efficacy and safety of TAP IR compared with other opioids for acute pain.
A systematic literature search as conducted using the Cochrane Library, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science. The search included all randomized controlled trials and observational studies examining TAP IR versus other orally administered IR opioids for acute pain. The protocol for this study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018110267).
Thirteen studies and 1 abstract were included in the systematic review (n=12,814 patients). Of these, 5 studies and 1 abstract were included in the qualitative review (n=9108 patients). Eight randomized controlled trials (n=3706 patients) comparing 50 to 100 mg TAP IR versus 5 to 15 mg oxycodone IR were included in the meta-analysis. The lowest dose of TAP IR (ie, 50 mg) was associated with less pain control compared with oxycodone IR (standardized mean difference=0.25, 95% confidence interval: 0.06-0.44, P<0.01). However, there were no significant differences at higher doses (ie, 75, 100 mg, or when a titration strategy was used). In the qualitative analysis, pain control with TAP IR was also similar to morphine IR and tramadol IR. TAP IR was less likely to have gastrointestinal adverse effects such as nausea and constipation compared with other opioids.
TAP IR is as effective as other opioids at higher doses for acute pain and is associated with fewer gastrointestinal adverse effects. On the basis of these findings, TAP IR can be considered as a first-line opioid for acute pain.
盐酸他喷他多(TAP)即释剂(IR)是一种新的阿片类药物选择,用于治疗急性疼痛。本系统评价的目的是评估 TAP IR 与其他阿片类药物治疗急性疼痛的疗效和安全性。
使用 Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、国际药学文摘、MEDLINE、PubMed 和 Web of Science 进行系统文献检索。该检索包括所有比较 TAP IR 与其他口服 IR 阿片类药物治疗急性疼痛的随机对照试验和观察性研究。本研究的方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42018110267)上注册。
本系统评价共纳入 13 项研究和 1 篇摘要(n=12814 例患者)。其中,5 项研究和 1 篇摘要纳入定性综述(n=9108 例患者)。8 项随机对照试验(n=3706 例患者)比较了 50 至 100mg TAP IR 与 5 至 15mg 羟考酮 IR,其中包括在荟萃分析中。TAP IR 的最低剂量(即 50mg)与羟考酮 IR 相比,疼痛控制效果较差(标准化均数差=0.25,95%置信区间:0.06-0.44,P<0.01)。然而,在较高剂量(即 75、100mg 或使用滴定策略时)则没有显著差异。在定性分析中,TAP IR 的疼痛控制效果也与吗啡 IR 和曲马多 IR 相似。与其他阿片类药物相比,TAP IR 不太可能出现胃肠道不良反应,如恶心和便秘。
TAP IR 与其他阿片类药物在较高剂量时治疗急性疼痛同样有效,且与较少的胃肠道不良反应相关。基于这些发现,TAP IR 可被视为急性疼痛的一线阿片类药物。